Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well my husband has now decided that he would love us to have another baby !!???!!! ARRGGHHH !! I really thought that we were done at 2 !!

We had our two children quite close together with only a 15mth gap between them. Our youngest is turning 2 in May.

We are also moving to Sth Derbyshire in 10 days and I think my husband just thinks new house, with a lot more room = time for another baby....

At first I was absolutely set against the idea, but now I'm just confused !!!! I'm really happy with our lovely two, but now I've got myself thinking maybe just one more ??????


Will it really be that much harder from 2 to 3 ???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15564-from-two-to-three/
Share on other sites

Oooh 2 to 3 was lovely for me. It was my favourite transition. Number 3 was a doddle, mainly cos I 'knew it all' (or so I thought!), but whatever I did, or didn't know I wasn't stressed and anxious like I was with the first two (close age gap also - 17 months). With hindsight I enjoyed baby 3 hugely beacuse with baby 1, well she was my first & it was stressful in the way that first babies are. Baby 2, well I really had 2 babies didn't I? so though it was OK it was sheer bloody hard work for a year or two. Baby 3 came when baby 2 was nearly 3 - so 1&2 were at school/nursery and I had time to really enjoy him. So the advice from my perspective is; go for it - if you want to. There are two people making this decision of course.

I've just had my third and agree that I'm definitely more chilled. My two older ones are in school so it does make it easier although the mornings are chaotic and the afternoons from about 3.30 until bedtime is also manic, but we love it. Car-wise it is a bit of a logistical challenge (must reply to Mellor's other thread about 3 car seats ...), but my husband went out and purchased a new car as a result. The transition for me was much harder from one to two children as my eldest was only 2 1/2 when her little sister came and I found it exhausting to have a newborn with a toddler no matter how much help I had (nanny, housekeeper, husband!).


Go for it! And best of luck.

I agree, SW, baby shopping is the best kind. Am obsessed. The staff at John Lewis Baby Stuff know me well, how sad.


I am only on my second (or will be in 5 months time) but remember Ma saying that going from 0-1 was a huge shock, 1-2 was difficult but by no means impossible and she knew a lot of it already- it was hard because she had a child to sort out and a newborn to look after. She said 2-3 was a doddle, and was a bit 'oh, do I have a newborn? I hardly noticed'. When she went into labour with Baby 3 she said 'Oh, the contractions are quite frequent now. I suppose I had better go to the hospital then...'. Going from 3-4 was easy peasy for her, but she stopped there.

I am on third in a sense as no 2 was twins, if you get me.. twins were 2.5 when new baby came. I have found this baby (once he started feeding!) the easiest and most pleasurable.


But logistics is an issue, going anywhere esp alone is hard, if they're ill it's hard, if they have to go to hospital it's impossible. People don't tend to invite you round... family tickets are always 2+2...

Would love to have three (have two), but don't think is an option for us 'cos of fertility issues.


Reckon working (even part-time) is pretty hard with three in the early years. Know several people who have just had their third and, while loving it, are having to give up their (part-time) jobs 'cos the childcare is just too difficult/costly, especially when one or more is at school, the other(s)toddlers / babies. My cousin had her kids in her twenties and had 7 years out, and has now returned to work (when her youngest was 2 1/2 she started going demented at home and husband was throwing his weight about a bit, being the sole breadwinner). She was unable to get a job doing what she did before so did a PGCE and is now working again (full-time though as no part-time jobs were available for new teachers in her area).


Is it only an option for those who decide to be a stay-at-home mum or is this a misconception?

Ive got 3 - 2.5, 4 and 5 and its hard. Totally agree that the arrival of number 3 was no problem at all, easy birth, easy breastfeeding, all that lovely sleeping they do (I could do all that again in a moment!!).


But now that they are toddlers/school age life is very very hard and more exhausting than ever. Getting around is difficult (1 scooter, 1 pushchair, 1 walking), any 2 together is fine but 3 together and they fight, I havnt had 1-on-1 time with any of them for about 2 years, my husband and I never have a day off or even a lie in (which means we sometimes fight!!), holidays are hellishly expensive (have to hire a massive car), childcare costs are astronomical and we found it very hard to find a nanny - several just point blank refused to look after 3. My husband and I both have to work full time (he 8-6, me 9-9) to afford this crazy life. So Ive got 3 children but I only ever see them at weekends and for 1 hour in the mornings.


Hummmmmm! Love them all madly though and wouldnt be without them.

Meakit, a good friend of mine wrote me an email last year saying almost exactly the same thing. Things went so well with #1 and #2 that she wanted one more and he's a darling, absolutely amazing kid (now 2.5) but her life has become much more difficult in many ways. She had to take her kids out of their private English school (mum is Hungarian, they live in Budapest but dad is English so they liked the idea of the English school - not for poshness but for bilingualism), rent out part of their house and so on. All totally worth it of course as it's "only money" but they have struggled a lot. What they found harder was the middle child not adapting very well and showing what could be middle child syndrome although you never know if the same behavioural issues would have come up if the little brother had not arrived.


Sometimes I almost want a third child as well and sometimes I think about my Hungarian friend and fear that I may resent my life if it becomes THAT dominated by kids. You'll always love all your children equally much and it must be true that you never regret having another child whereas you may regret not having one... so I would say "go for it" if you instinctively like the idea and "think it over a few more times" if your heart doesn't immediately say yes.

One to two much harder than two to three. Depends on gap tho, 2 was 3.5 when new baby arrived, has been a much nicer maternity leave than it was second time around

Big ones are lovely to new baby, no jealousy, lots of love, can see there may be logistical issues when they are bigger, but overall I wld say do it, I thought I was done with 2, but with hindsight, now I have the total 'done' feeling, I know I wasn't done at all.

I would love 3, have 2 (18 months apart) but due to stint abroad for a year with husband's work and my son (2nd) going through tough 2's and 3's (will it ever end!) i didn't feel it was the right time. Now my son is 4 and my daughter 5 1/2 and i wonder if i've left it too late! Some say it's great if they're at school then you have baby all to yourself but then who knows if the gap will be too much.Although when they're in their 20's it will seem like nothing im sure. I agree with not having that done feeling, just go with your gut, weigh out the options, talk it through lots and also another factor is if you have any help or can afford it. Neither my husband or I have family in this country so it can be difficult. We've not had a night alone in 5 1/2 years but at least we have a nice babysitter and can go out in the eve which is something

Pasta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>> Now my son is 4 and my daughter 5 1/2 and i

> wonder if i've left it too late! Some say it's

> great if they're at school then you have baby all

> to yourself but then who knows if the gap will be

> too much.


First child was 5 when the twins came.. I think it is actually a GOOD gap. 2.5 years now between the twins and the latest, and it's much harder work

I was undecided re a 3rd and so decided to spend a year not worrying about it and think about it later although time was running short. The first six months were ok but then I started thinking about yes/no every day and by 10mths into the year I was set on yes. She will be 2 next week and it is fab. I think the fact you are considering it is heading towards a yes but if you can take a little time and don't rush into the decision. I noticed that most older people who commented on the number of children they had regretted not having more but nobody regretted the ones they had.

I've been reading all of your comments and I appreciate you all taking the time to write about your own personal experiences.... I seem to be swaying from a definite yes, to a maybe, or a definite no each day !!! I can see ourselves just getting on with our two children at the mo, but then again I think how lovely it would be for our oldest daughter to remember having a baby around as she was only 15mths when our little boy was born and I know she would just adore a litlle baby in the house.

I guess now that we are moving and will actually have our families very close by is slightly making me think yes more than no . I think I've done the hardest job of 0 to 1 then 1 to 2 with no family help at all......


I also have it in my head that if we do go for number 3 then ideally I'd really like to have the baby in this year as the following year I am turning 40 and I think that in it's self is enough to cope with !!!!!

ljs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I also have it in my head that if we do go for

> number 3 then ideally I'd really like to have the

> baby in this year as the following year I am

> turning 40 and I think that in it's self is enough

> to cope with !!!!!



It certainly is as I've had no. 3 at 41!!! Good luck to you and your family.

I had a 7 month old when I turned 40 - at least it meant I had no time & was too tired to care!!!


I only have two but the 4.25 year age gap has been brilliant so far - youngest now 2.25 years old.


I'm done, but very happy when I get to cuddle other peoples babies!

Would love to go from 2-3 for same reasons as lots of people above. Mine were 18 months apart so no awareness of having a baby in the house, which I think they would both love. I have two boys and I think a third child would totally hang the dynamic which at the moment is largely about competition and fighting. Maybee I'm fooling myself, but I really think a new baby would make them more considerate, less rowdy etc...there would be a different focus in the house. They are both so gentle and sweet with friends' babies it brings a tear to my eye.


Simple fact is I cannot afford to stop working. Have recently moved house and couldn't possibly take much longer than 4 months maternity and then we'd be crippled by additional childcare costs. So depressing to have to consider money in the equation, but short of a lottery win, the numbers just won't add up


Very much envy all of you with 3+ kids and would love to know your secret!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...