Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What exactly are you not sure about? I live nearby catch the 63 bus at 7 & see young boys actually running to get the bus, they look like they are eager to get school which says something, pass it by on the bus about 7.15 and see lots of happy looking kids sounds good to me.

Does anyone have ,or know of anyone with a child at the school ?

Would be good to know what they think.


I was a bit dismayed to see just what constitutes a playground when I walked past it the other day .Seems such a shame that the pupils can't have a break in larger and more salubrious surroundings .

  • 4 weeks later...
yes we have just been offered a place here any views from parents with pupils in the school would be greatly appreciated. It was our last choice as i didn't warm to the headmaster and didn't like the minimal outdoor space and the chanting of latin before each lesson!!! I would like to hear all the positive things!!!

Who said kids worrying about being late was a negative? They run a very tight ship and they drum it into them right from the start that they can't be late.


http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxedu_reports/download/(id)/128319/(as)/135816_361501.pdf

There's a recent Ofsted report you can read.

Comments from report re space are interesting ,especially the second comment which gives the impression that a rethink is under way regarding total numbers .


The space and facilities are attractive and of a high

quality although outside recreational space, while adequate for the current number of

students, is limited on the site.


and


Managers are rightly exploring what the future numbers

of students should be in view of the small site


If the space is adequate with only 2 years on site ,what will it be when the school has 11 years plus a sixth form ?

yummumbums Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yes we have just been offered a place here any

> views from parents with pupils in the school would

> be greatly appreciated. It was our last choice as

> i didn't warm to the headmaster and didn't like

> the minimal outdoor space and the chanting of

> latin before each lesson!!! I would like to hear

> all the positive things!!!



All the (middle-class) parents I know with children at the school are very happy with it, apart from one that moved theirs after the first day. I'm sure they will split the lunches to cope with the limited outdoor space and they do have an indoor gym, and seem to use outdoor space creatively such as providing basketball, table football and table tennis.


They have a two week timetable which seems to cram in a great variety of subjects and the extra long days include enrichment which is compulsory. Enrichment includes the extra sport and fun things like cooking, debating, etc. However enrichment can be suspended if children fall behind in their lessons to give extra coaching in that subject.


The school trips have been exciting such as sailing, orienteering, theatre to see STOMP and have been free to parents.


The issue with the school so far has not been the quality of education (and there's some brill teachers, esp. maths, english, science, PE, dance, drama) but with the strict discipline which they call 'traditionl standards'. Children are given detention for very minor offences (e.g. standing up at the wrong time) and there are specific requirements for uniform that are not overlooked. Tie has to reach the waist, shirt has to buttoned to the top, only Harris branded bag to be used, only Harris hat to be worn, etc (they don't want their kids walking the streets looking like thugs). Hair must be at least number 2 long and on the first day when they started any boy that turned up with it any shorter was in detention until it grew back.


If children don't do their homework they they will find themselves in compulsory homework clubs.


The boys do complain about how strict it is - it's a big shock after primary - but they do seem to get used to it and love all the exciting stuff they get to do.


For admission there's no gimmicks, schlorships, 10% selections, etc, just distance from school, period.

Yeah, the banding is same as Aske's - they divide all entrants into 9 ability groups. Someone on one of the threads posted a link ages ago which suggested this is fairer than the 3 groupings that most schools use but I'm not sure how.


The Head (a Scot) went to Grammar school and seems to be trying to give a grammar experience. He has already turned around one failing school. He said he's aiming for a 100% GCSE pass rate otherwise he will see it as a personal failure.


I've been trying to think of other stuff the parents I know have told me, like they have industrial teaching kitchens to train boys as chefs and year 8s have already cooked for some elderly people in the community and they plan to offer trade skills like bricklaying on top of the academic stuff.


http://dulwichonview.org.uk/2010/02/05/harris-boys-academy-east-dulwich/

This link, that could seem lke propaganda, I'm assured by a Harris Boys parent is actually a very accurate picture of the school.

If there's a banding expert around ,( or possibly just someone who understands numbers ,unlike me )it would be good to hear their views on banding .

I'm afraid I find it confusing .

I understand that Harris schools have a banding system based on national scores ,so obviously aimed at getting a school population that reflects national attainment .

Which maybe is not very different from Southwark's profile ?

But I think the middle bands in popular schools can be very hard to get into and you need to be living very near the school .

Sorry ,not adding anything to the debate here ,just expressing my confusion !

my son goes to his school and although i think they are a good school my son hates it, they are extremely strict.


i know of a few parents who are trying to move there kids out of there, i am also looking at moving my son. hes only in year 7 and he dreads going in. hes being picked on by a group of boys and the teachers have been told yet they dont seem to do anything about it.


there very quick to punish about silly little things like talking in line and forgetting homework yet boys get away with bullying and when my son faught back he got a 2 hour detention with 3 day isolation.


there morals seem good but underneath im not so sure. there too regimental. these boys were children 1-2 years ago my boy has grown up too quick and is afraid to do anything at school incase he gets in to trouble.


the detention bit and the isolations are my concerns because they are too quick to punish. my son was put into isolation a few days ago for being rude to another lad, THERE BOYS there going to be rude to one another.


well thats my opinion anyway. if you want to know more by all means pm me, please dont misread this i do think there a good school but i think they are extrememly strict now for some children thats needed but mine is very sensitive and it really doesnt suit him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...