Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Awaiting further details of her call with Boris Johnson this morning.


Early reports are Merkel said if Germany wanted to leave the EU they could but Britain would need to leave Northern Ireland behind undern EU rules and the Republic of Ireland would have a say if NI could leave.


I emphasise early reports which need clarification.

She?s put her foot in it because she has said, intentionally or otherwise


We Germany could leave the EU because nobody could stop us. We can put up borders because nobody can stop us.


You U.K. can?t leave the EU because we can stop you. Further, one of our smallest members with barely 5 million people can hold you U.K. with nearly 70 million people hostage.


So much for your recent Supreme Court nonsense of Parliamentary Supremacy. We, the EU, will tell you what to do.


(More details of the Johnson/Merkel phone call here https://news.sky.com/story/angela-merkel-tells-pm-brexit-deal-overwhelmingly-unlikely-11830601

She might have just given Boris the loophole he?s been looking for.


He should go go to the Supreme Court now and argue there?s no point asking for an extension because the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it constitutionally tears itself apart.


That?ll get the white flag wavers frothing at the mouth

Brexit is problematic because of what it is and what it means logistically - not because of remainers, the EU or anyone else


Too many people who voted to leave have changed their minds for the 17m number to have any validity especially given the turmoil leaving with no deal with cause


It has zero legitimacy. It doesn't need proceeding with - it needs to be stopped

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He should go go to the Supreme Court now and argue

> there?s no point asking for an extension because

> the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it

> constitutionally tears itself apart.


Wait... you think the Supreme Court can overturn an Act of Parliament?

stepdown Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He should go go to the Supreme Court now and

> argue

> > there?s no point asking for an extension

> because

> > the U.K. can never leave the EU unless it

> > constitutionally tears itself apart.

>

> Wait... you think the Supreme Court can overturn

> an Act of Parliament?


No stepdown. However if certain stipulations within an Act are ?void due to impossibility? then the SC could agree that is the case.


My point is although the concept is mainly to do with Contract Law, the purpose of ?forcing? the PM to write a letter requesting an extension under the Surrender/Capitulation/Humiliation Act is to prevent the U.K. leaving without a deal.


However, if Merkel?s words are as reported (and that is being questioned) then the U.K. (as an indivisible entity) can never leave.


Thus, there is no point in requesting an extension. An extension to what. The U.K. is trapped in the EU and can never leave. It can only leave if it jettisons NI and if it did that it would no longer be the U.K.


In short, Boris would not be breaking the law because it would be impossible for a PM of the U.K. to obey it.


(Can I get away with that argument M?Lud?)

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keano - that's absolute bobbins

>

> What she is saying is that "if we, Germany decide

> to leave the eu, we could without the problems the

> UK has"

>

> Not because the EU is forbidding them - but

> because of UK claim to Ireland. Germany doesn't

> have that. Thats' the comparison


I'm surprised you even believe what a source from No.10 said. It's probably Cummings. I really don't buy the shit coming out of Downing Street.

there will never be any agreement between the EU and the UK's Brexit because everything the UK wants from Brexit is NOT

allowed under the rules of the EU. Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by saying that NI should stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or what?

Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the fact that it is rubbish and does the poor people of the richer countries no good at all..the EU is a massive social and wealth distribution experiment but unfortunately it is the poorer people of the UK who have suffered most - but the majority of people of ED, and other well-off suburbs would not understand that as they have benefited greatly from the whole deal and expressed themselves with their over-privileged verbosity at every opportunity.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm surprised you even believe what a source from

> No.10 said. It's probably Cummings. I really don't

> buy the shit coming out of Downing Street.


The problem is overly keen 'journalists' report this nonsense in order to get a scoop, without checking accuracy, legitimacy and applying any semblance of critical thought. They are useful idiots, being played, nothing more than propaganda conduits. Expect more of the same tactic until journalists start naming these 'sources'...

there will never be any agreement between the EU and the UK's Brexit because everything the UK wants from Brexit is NOT

allowed under the rules of the EU.


Everything? really?


Now Merkel is trying to stir up trouble by saying that NI should stay in the EU customs union....sneaky or what?


Not sneaky and not new - just the same fact that has always been true that England doesn't want to address



Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the fact that it is rubbish


you have lost your mind - poor people exist in NI and Scotland as well you know - they haven't voted for this shitshow

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brexit is making the EU machine face up to the

> fact that it is rubbish and does the poor people

> of the richer countries no good at all..the EU is

> a massive social and wealth distribution

> experiment but unfortunately it is the poorer


No that's Austerity

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

it is the poorer

> people of the UK who have suffered most - but the

> majority of people of ED, and other well-off

> suburbs would not understand that as they have

> benefited greatly from the whole deal and

> expressed themselves with their over-privileged

> verbosity at every opportunity.


48% is not a metropolitan elite, just another cliched piece of bullshit from Brexiters. There's no substance just crap unconvincing cliches, deep in their hearts I think they know it too.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In short, Boris would not be breaking the law

> because it would be impossible for a PM of the

> U.K. to obey it.


Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" of the act is as you say, nothing you raised impacts his ability to comply with the law.



uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> expressed themselves with their over-privileged

> verbosity at every opportunity.


The irony of this as a closing statement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dawsons heights is not run by Southwark  Council- it comes under a management company,
    • I’m currently conducting exploratory research into menstrual health education in UK secondary schools and would really value the insight of PSHE leads, Heads of Year, or pastoral staff.    The research aims to understand:   How the menstrual cycle is currently taught within the RSHE framework Where schools feel confident — and where there may be gaps Whether students are taught and  asking questions around the full menstrual cycle, symptoms, wellbeing and conditions such as PMS/PMDD or endometriosis How schools support students in feeling empowered to understand their bodies and seek help appropriately Whether education around nutrition, lifestyle, and menstrual wellbeing is currently addressed   The long-term goal is to explore whether there is a need for additional, age-appropriate, medically informed support on the menstrual cycle.  I’m not selling a programme and there is no obligation beyond a 30 minute informal chat online (Unpaid). All conversations will be confidential and used only to inform the research. If you work in a UK secondary school and would be willing to share your perspective, I would be extremely grateful to hear from you. Please comment below or email me [email protected] Thank you for the vital work you do. Best wishes, Emma       
    • Nice topic and nice song!  1) Definitely top of Canonbie, looking North. 2) What used to be Francesca Cabrini school at the top of FHR. 3) Honor Oak playground, next to Camberwell New cemetery.
    • https://link.dice.fm/vAN1wkYO9Yb?sharer_id=5b9635360e0d4e77db542ea3
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...