Jump to content

Funding cuts, "Big Society", and shovelling walks


Recommended Posts

When living in the States (Philadelphia) we were required by ordinance, within 24 hours of the end of a snowfall, to have the walks in front of our house cleared a yard wide and gritted. Officers patrolled and fines were issued for non-compliance. Every householder / renter, every custodian (in apartment buildings), had a snowshovel and a grit bucket -- or an arrangement with a teenager two doors away, a neighbour, or the like, who would do the shovelling. Our renters' insurance included liability for slips and falls on "our" walks.


Might not such an ordinance, brought into effect in Southwark (or at least in SE22), perhaps coupled with a warning to check the terms under which one is insured, save money for the Borough and spare some other service from funding cuts? Could it be brought into effect in time for the 2011-2012 snow season?


I'd rather shovel my own walks than lose two days' service at the Grove Vale library branch, for example...


Mr Barber, your thoughts?

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As excellent an idea as this might be, I don't

> think it is fair to expect Mr.Barber to pick up on

> a particular thread amongst many threads, when he

> has his own thread for specific questions for him.


Why doesn't someone "shovel" this thread over to Ol' J.B ?



;-)

(tu)

This sounds quite utopian in essence but unfortunately for me, 'big society' is a mask for 'big savings'. These big savings will hit the most vulnerable. 'Big society' my arse. Now we are getting a real glimpse of what cameron et al are all about.


I'd like to think that neighbourly behaviour such as clearing paths of ice should be gesture of good will, rather than law.

I'd like that too!


But humans (or this particular humans, and many of his acquaintance) need ... encouragement to behave at their best. Dog mess, litter, you name it. We all fall short of what ought to be. An ordinance (Don't litter; take away your dog's droppings; shovel your walk) acknowledges that need for encouragement.

Not sure about ordinances, although quite happy to shovel if required (and can borrow a shovel, don't have much need for one in a first floor flat!), but I'm not sure about insurance - wouldn't this be yet another excuse for the insurance companies to put our premiums up?


Also, proving liability would be a nightmare. What if you're away for the weekend, it snows, you're not there to clear it (and no-one else you can contact can do it either - would certainly be the case for us), someone slips... and your insurance premiums sky rocket, or your insurer refuses to pay out as you weren't there to clear the snow and you get sued by the slipee.

The Big Society is about far mora than this - about the legion of people that run Scout Groups, Girl Guides, youth clubs, Saturday morning football clubs, boot fairs for charity, check their neighbours to see if they need assistance, doing all this and much, much more.


A practical example (from USA) - a good friend of mine, expat Scotsman, came down with a major, life threatening, illness. He lived in a medium sized town in Louisianna. His neighbours organised a rota to ensure his wife was driven to the specialist hospital, took his children to school, cooked meals for the family and had the children to stay overnight. All pretty good - and you might congratulate yourselves that "we would do that too" - excepth this went on for 15 months. That's a community looking after its own - and is the sort of thing that should be second nature in a Big Society.


BTW - my friends had only lived in that community for two / three years.

How much council tax (or equivalent) did you pay in Philly?


If I didn't pay any (or a substantially reduced amount) then fair enough. But at the current level I believe that money should be used to pay for services such as street cleaning including, on those rare occassions, snow and ice.

@david_carnell: Around $350 / year to the county for services (street cleaning, lighting, rubbish collection once the week, fire / police / paramedics), around $1750 / year to the city for schools / libraries. Yep, the city levied a fee to support the educational system.


Different scheme altogether, eh?

David Carnell - if we expect the "authorities" to do everything because we pay them that leads to a stifling bureaucracy and evisceration of civic society, never mind Big Society.


The more we do for ourselves, our neighbours and our community the more focussed, more appropriate and, probably, the higher the quality the services will be. An additional bonus would be to reduce the cost of local and national services.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...