Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Six left? Episodes 15,16 then 17,18 and 19.20 to come, so finale is Sat 26th March?


If any of you had a heart, at all, you could post a bit of an update for those of us who haven't seen anything since episode 8. For instance, who is Olav? Olav? Did you make him up?

Ive just caught up with ep 16 all the red herrings seem to be falling by the wayside as the jumper gets back on the case.

Lund is getting support in following up her new lead which is proving to be finally on the right track and seems to be shedding light on more then just Nannas murder. Olav was just a space filler and of not much importance apart from who he dealt with and the killer is close to being revealed with a big clue in this episode.

Er...we know there were two killers, and one has already been identified and done a suicide-by-cop! :)) The pattern thus far of this riveting series seems to be to introduce a new suspect/red herring at the start of alternate episodes, and show how he cannot be the culprit in the following episode. In between these 2 events we get to holler from behind the sofa at Lund for stupidly going into darkened, perilous buildings without back-up, flashlight, gun, portable nuclear weapon etc etc.


With just 2 hours to go I still think it could be Rie's dad!B)

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Oh flipping heck.


Just getting my way through this, and then I saw a comment about series 2.


Is this going to be one of those silly bloody serials where you don't find out what happens before you've been dragged through several series of deteriorating quality and increasingly silly new characters?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...