Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is swings and roundabouts....there are bad customers as much as bad tradesmen. It is normal for some kind of up front fee to be agreed and on average companies ask for 30%...others more, others less. The key is have agreed terms that you are happy with and a contract in place that explains what is agreed.


A builder that takes all the money up front can rip someone off as much as the customer that never had the money to pay their hardworking builder. There is an element of trust on both sides. I think it's perfectly reasonable for a builder to cover the building materials costs with an up front fee, and for the customer to pay in stages as the work is completed. That is how most large building contracts are set up.


Binda is a con man...and a con is a con whatever the service being offered.

In the wider construction industry it is commonplace for contractors to be paid on a monthly basis for works done to that date (measured against an agreed schedule), rather than a single cheque at the end. But in the first month there is often a payment for "set up costs" which may include monies for materials. The most important thing for any purchaser is to have a written contract that details what monies are to be paid when and for what. However, the difficulty for the home owner is being able to judge what part of the works carry what costs and ensuring that they don't pay the most money for the least expensive parts of the work. Unless you are confident reading drawings and specifications then it's a good idea to get an independent professional to have a watching brief.
In defence of Stuart and his wife - Binda did not come across at all like he does in real life. He is incredibly persuasive. Because he claims to have been architecturally trained unless you have used an architect it is easy to think his methods are OK. He has done other work ( some are reference sites) which are fine. I rate him as a con man rather than a cowboy. He's perfectly capable of doing a decent job. He just chose not to with those of us who appeared on the programme. I think that makes him particularly dangerous.
  • 2 months later...
We had extensive building work done by Andrea Binda over four years ago. We quickly discovered major problems with the electrics and central heating he had installed; both were very dangerous and had to be re-installed. Although this work was disruptive and costly, we comforted ourselves with the thought that his building work, which included a large kitchen extension project, passed muster in the opinion of a structural engineer. Unfortunately, we were kidding ourselves. Today, the builder who came to our rescue after Binda had vandalised our home uncovered some shockingly inept structural work. The job was so badly executed as to be almost deliberately incompetent. Suffice it to say that we will require extensive reinforcement of our kitchen extension. We are facing many weeks of disruption and tens of thousands of pounds of expense; and this more than four years after we initially ejected him from the site. I agree with what has been written about about how charming and superficially plausible Binda is capable of seeming. I disagree strongly regarding his ability to do decent work. All of the people I know who have employed this man have encountered substantial problems. I only hope that they have discovered the true extent of the damage he is capable of. We certainly had not. Please, please do not use this dangerous, wilfully negligent fraudster.
Since writing my piece, my new builders discovered highly dangerous wiring and a completely botched central heating installation which leaked underneath my kitchen floor. Needless to say - extra costs to rip out the existing floor and replace it. I only hope that the Cowboy Builders show manages to persuade Trading Standards to prosecute him.
  • 4 months later...
Businesses can go bust overnight depending on executive decisions. Then consequences can affect people not originally connected to your business, and occasionally the carnage can be monumental. I've known Binda for a couple of years. Personally he's never been anything less than courteous and encouraging. I'm not making any statement, nor judging. I hope all concerned get compensated, but I don't see any malice in Binda. Here, he lookes particualrly ignorant and evil, but T.V can do that...
  • 3 months later...
I've just seen a Linked-In request from "Anrea Binda, FRSA", currently "Director at Valued Properties London Ltd.", which a check on Companies House shows to have been incorporated 30 Nov 2011. I'll be emailing the Director of Fellowship at the RSA to check if the FRSA is genuine.

LoveFruit Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Businesses can go bust overnight depending on

> executive decisions. Then consequences can affect

> people not originally connected to your business,

> and occasionally the carnage can be monumental.

> I've known Binda for a couple of years.

> Personally he's never been anything less than

> courteous and encouraging. I'm not making any

> statement, nor judging. I hope all concerned get

> compensated, but I don't see any malice in Binda.

> Here, he lookes particualrly ignorant and evil,

> but T.V can do that...


This post smells somewhat

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...