Jump to content

Could a moderator please get in touch. I've got a problem with my account.


Scribe

Recommended Posts

type a one word post in the "about section" - just a neutral word like... well "neutral" would do


does that post ok? If it does then there isn't anything wrong with your account - the problem is likely to be a combination of letters which amount to a swearword in the database filters - "specialist" caused problems for a while because of this


If you can't even post "neutral" as a post tehn there is a problem with your account and mere moderators can't help - PM Administrator and see what he comes back with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, but I can't type anything into the about section as there's a box at the foot of each thread telling me: "Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum."


It's exactly the same case in the ED issues section. But thanks, I'll get in touch with the administrator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't think of anything that I've done to incur an "EDF ASBO". I haven't swore or criticised a business in the ED issues section, or any section for that matter. Although my last comment, on a thread about a Blackberry being handed-in to the security guard at Somerfield has been removed, but I can't think why.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



ooh I can answer that - it's because what you actually posted implied that guard was on the make and fencing the BB in question. But pretending poor ickle you made an innocent posting only to have it removed is familiar territory isn't it?


Another reason someone might not be allowed to post in some sections is that perhaps Admin has you figured for a previous poster what has being been banned many a time and is suspicious. perhaps you could allay those fears?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I'm rather taken aback by the innocuous direction this thread has taken, from what I regard was an innocent request on my part. Not to mention accusatory from one quarter.




Yes, I did suggest that the security guard at Somerfield may have pocketed said Blackberry. But is that so unrealistic an outcome? And where did "poor ickle" me pretend, or otherwise, that I'd posted an "innocent posting"? I didn't. I submitted what I thought was a reasonable comment. And this reaction seems rather heavy-handed seeing as a user has posted a thread in which he or she claims that they want to drown the royal family. But that post, compared to what I submitted, seems far more inflammatory, not to mention threatening, than suggesting what could turn-out to be the case i.e - the blackberry was pocketed by the security guard. I mean, do you have any evidence that proves otherwise?




Then I suggest, unless it is you that suspects me, for whatever reason, of being "a previous poster what has being been banned many a time", that you leave whoever may have cause for suspicion to voice their concern themselves.




Thanks for replying, and let's hope these "issues" are resolved in due course. Although you could've just responded to the private email I sent you. Anyway, thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Scribe, I am concerned that you are a poster who was previously banned. Please note your 'private email' was sent after you posted this thread, I answered your first message.


Karter, there are different reasons for a ban and therefore different reasons for lifting a ban. If you are asking about a particular user please PM me although I may not be able to disclose information about individuals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...