Jump to content

Could a moderator please get in touch. I've got a problem with my account.


Recommended Posts

type a one word post in the "about section" - just a neutral word like... well "neutral" would do


does that post ok? If it does then there isn't anything wrong with your account - the problem is likely to be a combination of letters which amount to a swearword in the database filters - "specialist" caused problems for a while because of this


If you can't even post "neutral" as a post tehn there is a problem with your account and mere moderators can't help - PM Administrator and see what he comes back with

Thanks for the info, but I can't type anything into the about section as there's a box at the foot of each thread telling me: "Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum."


It's exactly the same case in the ED issues section. But thanks, I'll get in touch with the administrator.

I can't think of anything that I've done to incur an "EDF ASBO". I haven't swore or criticised a business in the ED issues section, or any section for that matter. Although my last comment, on a thread about a Blackberry being handed-in to the security guard at Somerfield has been removed, but I can't think why.
  Quote


ooh I can answer that - it's because what you actually posted implied that guard was on the make and fencing the BB in question. But pretending poor ickle you made an innocent posting only to have it removed is familiar territory isn't it?


Another reason someone might not be allowed to post in some sections is that perhaps Admin has you figured for a previous poster what has being been banned many a time and is suspicious. perhaps you could allay those fears?

  • Administrator

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Officially when is someone that has been banned

> allowed back in the club?


When the ban has been lifted.

I have to admit that I'm rather taken aback by the innocuous direction this thread has taken, from what I regard was an innocent request on my part. Not to mention accusatory from one quarter.


  Quote


Yes, I did suggest that the security guard at Somerfield may have pocketed said Blackberry. But is that so unrealistic an outcome? And where did "poor ickle" me pretend, or otherwise, that I'd posted an "innocent posting"? I didn't. I submitted what I thought was a reasonable comment. And this reaction seems rather heavy-handed seeing as a user has posted a thread in which he or she claims that they want to drown the royal family. But that post, compared to what I submitted, seems far more inflammatory, not to mention threatening, than suggesting what could turn-out to be the case i.e - the blackberry was pocketed by the security guard. I mean, do you have any evidence that proves otherwise?


  Quote


Then I suggest, unless it is you that suspects me, for whatever reason, of being "a previous poster what has being been banned many a time", that you leave whoever may have cause for suspicion to voice their concern themselves.


  Quote


Thanks for replying, and let's hope these "issues" are resolved in due course. Although you could've just responded to the private email I sent you. Anyway, thanks again.

  • Administrator

Scribe, I am concerned that you are a poster who was previously banned. Please note your 'private email' was sent after you posted this thread, I answered your first message.


Karter, there are different reasons for a ban and therefore different reasons for lifting a ban. If you are asking about a particular user please PM me although I may not be able to disclose information about individuals.

  • Administrator
You can add regalia to that list. As mentioned in an email to you, there is ongoing legal action because of comments made on the forum, we want to distance ourselves from that type of behaviour.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...