Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Narnia,


you could do worse than check out 123-reg.co.uk for hosting - there are other companies out there, but you can buy a domain name from them fairly cheaply and get hosting (including a bunch of email boxes) for about ?40 a year.


As I say, there are others, but I've not used them so hard to comment.


good luck!

I use http://orchardhosting.com/. I switched to them from http://www.heartinternet.co.uk/ Both are quite good, but Orchard had a better deal on Joomla hosting, so I switched to them.


Orchard charge ?4 per year for a .co.uk domain name (that's portable to another provider if you ever change - you might want to check that other deals) and have hosting packages at ?9.99, ?24.99, ?49.99 per year. The couple of times I have needed to contact support the response has been excellent.

You should give some thought to what you want your website to do, and how you want to build it before selecting a host.


For my own sites I use DotNetNuke, a highly flexible and modular content management system. However, it needs a particular hosting environment using .NET and SQL.


DNN generates pages at the point that they're accessed, meaning that it's processor hungry. For this reason I steer clear of the kind of bulk hosting suppliers that drive costs down by cramming as many websites as possible onto each server.


If you want to retail online then you need to give some thought to server security, and the demands of payment gateways and so on.


If you want to use DNN to generate a fantastic website at very little effort, then you might want to use a specialist supplier like powerdnn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...