Jump to content

Recommended Posts

okay, he shouldn't have said what he said. And on the mobile phone video I've seen he's bang to rights although clearly tipsy. He's said sorry. Surely this should be end of?


Why destroy the career of a maverick because a private conversation in a Paris cafe has gone global?


I don't for a minute believe he meant what he said. we all say things we don't mean.


The question I'm asking here is - is modern technology making us one-dimensional?


That is, is the baying of the mob on Titter and Facebook overriding tried and tested legal procedures?


Strikes me modern communications are starting to enslave mankind with some naive view that the majority is important.

What a thick skin you have silverfox.


I think 'abuse' is probably more accurate than 'said', and regarding content consider this as a jewish couple whose grandparents likely were victims of the holocaust: "I love Hitler" and, "People like you would be dead. Your mothers, your forefathers, would all be f**king gassed."


Having said that, he just looked like a pathetic drunken prat, but he does have history on these views.


From a commercial point of view, being associated with such views may well impact on your choice of designer dress.


From a legal point of view, in France it's illegal. He's a high-profile defendant with indisputable evidence. The authorities are required to prosecute or a face a disintegration of government authority.


Personally I think he's seriously disturbed. Hence 'sorry' isn't enough, but I'm not sure what outcome is appropriate.

Yes but if you look at the video (link below) he is insulting a person or persons to the left of the person recording the scene. we don't know what led to the tirade and the recording smacks of a set up.



http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3433777/Fashion-legend-Galliano-arrested.html

Set up?!?


It smacks of a couple of people, having listened to a drunken, racist tirade, unsure whether it's hilarious or disturbing, recording a snippet for their mates, then selling it on when they find out who he was.


I can't say I actually care, the fashion world is anathema to me, so vaccuous and pointless is it (I actually almost physically puked during the why-fashion-matters speech in that awful devil prada film missus mockers forced me to sit through), but I'm not sure it will ruin his career.


The industry has failed to demonstrate any sense of morality at all (in fact seems to revel in its bulemia inducing, paedophilia encouraging, heroin romanticising ways) ever, so I'm sure he'll be hired by someone soon, probably by Dior.


Maybe he should get someone to film him snorting coke, that usually seems to do the trick.


Oh and he's obviously a massive egomaniacal cunt (who isn't in the fashion world?), but again, who cares. At least Charlie Sheen was funny!

I just don't get the relevance of your assertion silverfox.


Even if the videomaker had known that Galiano was a racist bigot, he didn't make him one.


Galliano was spouting horrific racist invective that celebrated genocide whilst using it as a verbal weapon to attack, demean and humiliate his neighbour. No-one made him do that.


Do you think it's okay behaviour if there's not a camera around?

Nope. Why should it? Not everything is a conspiracy.


I'd say in a desirable area of a rich western capital, 80% of people have a phone capable of doing that. From their voices they sounded like women in their twenties, so lets bump that up to 95% phone ownership, 98% that they are youtube culture proficient.


I'm amazed these days if someone behaves like this and they don't end up splashed across the press.

What could possibly be a relevent excuse?


10 secs before the camera rolls he says, "So I've just been cast as a racist bigot in a film and this is the type of thing I reckon would work....what do you think?"


Pur-lease. Like Mockers, I couldn't give two shits about the industry or the vacuous pillocks who inhabit it, but this guy is a 24 carat dick.


There isn't even a debate to be had here.

I think he's a disgusting, disgraceful, and shameful man and I say good riddance. There is NO excuse for what he said. Anyone who can make the comments he did, whether drunk or not, does not deserve a high-flying job or the kudos that goes with it.


Men like himself think they're untouchable because they're head of the brand but the truth is designers work with huge teams they're not some kind of lone artist/'maverick'. I'm sure there are loads of designers who are just as good as him and could do just as good a job at Dior and deserve it far more. I applaud Dior taking the action it did.


And he didn't even say sorry he bloody well try to deny it so he's a cowardly liar as well. Then the video came out. You can't set someone up for saying what he did and he spoke in English because he is originally English which is even more shameful.

I agree with you on this issue, MP you right in regards to the fashion industry my sister is still in the industry and my parents was in the industry they had to put up with rude self-absorbed designers bubble headed models in there day I don?t think that has changed. There is no sense of morality consumerism is king unfortunately the fashion industry is fickle give it a few months and another fashion house will hire him.

On reflection that was a bit harsh.


There's a high profile representative layer, the models the catwalks, those awful magazines, the bullshit, that is pretty loathsome.


Then there's the layer below, the ruthless manufacturers fat cats who own nothing but a brand whilst outsourcing manufacture to sweatshops and indentured labour.


But there are of course literally tens of millions worldwide involved to some degree in the wider fashion industry (what the awful people would no doubt sneeringly describe as 'high street' or even worse 'tailoring'), and of course I have no issue with them.

David_carnell said:

"There isn't even a debate to be had here ..."


oh but there is


The debate is:


a private drunken argument in a Paris bar is none of your business.



What right do any of us have to serve judgement on private squabbles?



Sticks and stones?


It was a set up!

silverfox, twitter and Facebook have nothing to do with it.


When push comes to shove, many of the frock buyers are ladies who may well be Jewish, in many countries. There is no way that his employer can countenance that sort of behaviour, however drunk he was, without facing a massive walkout of customers. The damage will be severe even with sacking him.


I thought Galliano and his ilk had minders to prevent this sort of thing. Where were they?

At the end of the day Galliano has to take repsonsibility for the words that come out of his mouth. The fact that someone was at hand to record it is neither here nor there. I can not understand why anyone would even begin to defend him.


His employer fired him because he's a liability and he has only himself to blame for that.

Didn't The Sun claim exclusivity for this story?


if I'm correct on this doesn't this worry anybody about the possibility of a set up?


yes, I know Dior's boss is Jewish. he has worked with Galliano for years. If this tirade is a revelation to him he's either a poor judge of character or has turned a blind eye for years because the tills kept ringing. you decide.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...