Jump to content

Recommended Posts

okay, he shouldn't have said what he said. And on the mobile phone video I've seen he's bang to rights although clearly tipsy. He's said sorry. Surely this should be end of?


Why destroy the career of a maverick because a private conversation in a Paris cafe has gone global?


I don't for a minute believe he meant what he said. we all say things we don't mean.


The question I'm asking here is - is modern technology making us one-dimensional?


That is, is the baying of the mob on Titter and Facebook overriding tried and tested legal procedures?


Strikes me modern communications are starting to enslave mankind with some naive view that the majority is important.

What a thick skin you have silverfox.


I think 'abuse' is probably more accurate than 'said', and regarding content consider this as a jewish couple whose grandparents likely were victims of the holocaust: "I love Hitler" and, "People like you would be dead. Your mothers, your forefathers, would all be f**king gassed."


Having said that, he just looked like a pathetic drunken prat, but he does have history on these views.


From a commercial point of view, being associated with such views may well impact on your choice of designer dress.


From a legal point of view, in France it's illegal. He's a high-profile defendant with indisputable evidence. The authorities are required to prosecute or a face a disintegration of government authority.


Personally I think he's seriously disturbed. Hence 'sorry' isn't enough, but I'm not sure what outcome is appropriate.

Yes but if you look at the video (link below) he is insulting a person or persons to the left of the person recording the scene. we don't know what led to the tirade and the recording smacks of a set up.



http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3433777/Fashion-legend-Galliano-arrested.html

Set up?!?


It smacks of a couple of people, having listened to a drunken, racist tirade, unsure whether it's hilarious or disturbing, recording a snippet for their mates, then selling it on when they find out who he was.


I can't say I actually care, the fashion world is anathema to me, so vaccuous and pointless is it (I actually almost physically puked during the why-fashion-matters speech in that awful devil prada film missus mockers forced me to sit through), but I'm not sure it will ruin his career.


The industry has failed to demonstrate any sense of morality at all (in fact seems to revel in its bulemia inducing, paedophilia encouraging, heroin romanticising ways) ever, so I'm sure he'll be hired by someone soon, probably by Dior.


Maybe he should get someone to film him snorting coke, that usually seems to do the trick.


Oh and he's obviously a massive egomaniacal cunt (who isn't in the fashion world?), but again, who cares. At least Charlie Sheen was funny!

I just don't get the relevance of your assertion silverfox.


Even if the videomaker had known that Galiano was a racist bigot, he didn't make him one.


Galliano was spouting horrific racist invective that celebrated genocide whilst using it as a verbal weapon to attack, demean and humiliate his neighbour. No-one made him do that.


Do you think it's okay behaviour if there's not a camera around?

Nope. Why should it? Not everything is a conspiracy.


I'd say in a desirable area of a rich western capital, 80% of people have a phone capable of doing that. From their voices they sounded like women in their twenties, so lets bump that up to 95% phone ownership, 98% that they are youtube culture proficient.


I'm amazed these days if someone behaves like this and they don't end up splashed across the press.

What could possibly be a relevent excuse?


10 secs before the camera rolls he says, "So I've just been cast as a racist bigot in a film and this is the type of thing I reckon would work....what do you think?"


Pur-lease. Like Mockers, I couldn't give two shits about the industry or the vacuous pillocks who inhabit it, but this guy is a 24 carat dick.


There isn't even a debate to be had here.

I think he's a disgusting, disgraceful, and shameful man and I say good riddance. There is NO excuse for what he said. Anyone who can make the comments he did, whether drunk or not, does not deserve a high-flying job or the kudos that goes with it.


Men like himself think they're untouchable because they're head of the brand but the truth is designers work with huge teams they're not some kind of lone artist/'maverick'. I'm sure there are loads of designers who are just as good as him and could do just as good a job at Dior and deserve it far more. I applaud Dior taking the action it did.


And he didn't even say sorry he bloody well try to deny it so he's a cowardly liar as well. Then the video came out. You can't set someone up for saying what he did and he spoke in English because he is originally English which is even more shameful.

I agree with you on this issue, MP you right in regards to the fashion industry my sister is still in the industry and my parents was in the industry they had to put up with rude self-absorbed designers bubble headed models in there day I don?t think that has changed. There is no sense of morality consumerism is king unfortunately the fashion industry is fickle give it a few months and another fashion house will hire him.

On reflection that was a bit harsh.


There's a high profile representative layer, the models the catwalks, those awful magazines, the bullshit, that is pretty loathsome.


Then there's the layer below, the ruthless manufacturers fat cats who own nothing but a brand whilst outsourcing manufacture to sweatshops and indentured labour.


But there are of course literally tens of millions worldwide involved to some degree in the wider fashion industry (what the awful people would no doubt sneeringly describe as 'high street' or even worse 'tailoring'), and of course I have no issue with them.

David_carnell said:

"There isn't even a debate to be had here ..."


oh but there is


The debate is:


a private drunken argument in a Paris bar is none of your business.



What right do any of us have to serve judgement on private squabbles?



Sticks and stones?


It was a set up!

silverfox, twitter and Facebook have nothing to do with it.


When push comes to shove, many of the frock buyers are ladies who may well be Jewish, in many countries. There is no way that his employer can countenance that sort of behaviour, however drunk he was, without facing a massive walkout of customers. The damage will be severe even with sacking him.


I thought Galliano and his ilk had minders to prevent this sort of thing. Where were they?

At the end of the day Galliano has to take repsonsibility for the words that come out of his mouth. The fact that someone was at hand to record it is neither here nor there. I can not understand why anyone would even begin to defend him.


His employer fired him because he's a liability and he has only himself to blame for that.

Didn't The Sun claim exclusivity for this story?


if I'm correct on this doesn't this worry anybody about the possibility of a set up?


yes, I know Dior's boss is Jewish. he has worked with Galliano for years. If this tirade is a revelation to him he's either a poor judge of character or has turned a blind eye for years because the tills kept ringing. you decide.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/information-hub/assistance-dogs-emotional-support-dogs-and-therapy-dogs/   hello   i’d be interested to understand if anyone.has experience of Assistance Dogs especially for autistic children of different ages for emotional support and therapy   There was a prior thread on this topic on EDF 10 hrs ago but it had limited experiences and there was a (claimed) change in UK legislation in 2019. Whilst the industry appears unregulated/unlicensed, there are several providers (approx 15, perhaps more) who claim to have fully trained dogs or say that they can help families to train a puppy/young dog over the 18-24 months.  The latter obviously comes with a need for strong commitment to the challenge. Costs for a fully trained assistance dog are quoted at £13-15k albeit they claim £23k total cost to train the dog. On the one hand, this could potentially be a useful solution for some families if such a dog was truly trained as their websites claim and such a dog was accepted in public places and schools etc… On the other hand, I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an assistance dog of this type or in this context (only for a blind or partially sighted person) and hence a real risk of fraud or exploitation! The SEN challenge for families coupled with limited resources in schools or from local authorities or the NHS as well as the extremely challenging experience of many families with schools offering little or no support or making the situation worse leaves a big risk of lots of different types of fraud and or exploitation in this area.          
    • Hi there  We live on Woodwarde Road backing on to Alleyns Top Field.  Our cat Gigi has gone missing — it’s been about 24 hours now. She is a cream Bengal. Could you please check sheds, garages, or anywhere she might have got stuck please? And if you could keep an eye out or share on any local groups/forums, we’d really appreciate it. Photo attached.   Thanks so much! My name is Jeff on 07956 910068. 
    • Colin.    One for the old school.   Just saying.
    • Signed, and I will share it elsewhere, thank you for posting this. It's got nearly 70,000 signatures at present, and apparently runs till February.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...