Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If there is an external problem the most likely cause is work on a flexibility point (pillar or cabinet) local to you - it may be worth popping out and seeing if anyone is working on one. It is very easy to inadvertently disconnect one set of pairs (or one half of a pair) whilst working on another - about a quarter of all faults used to be classed as 'working party' faults for that reason, although far less work now goes on in pillars and cabinets (they are green boxes forming part of street furniture).


It is worth checking your phone - those can also go wrong - and indeed make sure that your own internal wiring is sound - see if you are getting dial tone off a phone connected to your master socket (the first one into the house).


BT can quite easily check the line for integrity - you can call them from a mobile. I assume that you are not using BT to support your internet use - otherwise if there was a complete break in line integrity you could not have posted this message - if your voice link is down but your adsl is working that may be a technical fault at the exchange (but more normally is a function of internal wiring problems).

> I had this problem before, it took 2 weeks for BT to finally admit it was the external line that was at fault!


I found them very quick, I think next day repair, once it was established that it was definitely a line fault. You might do a belt-and-braces by invoking your own line check or fault status check, from another line, via http://www.bt.com/faults.

If there are lots of lines down, then there may well have been a 'JCB' incident (someone cuts through a cable) - this happened a lot when the cable companies were laying lots of cable, and street works can still do this. If a cable is cut repair is non trivial - unlike a gas or water or electricty pipe (which is just a single conduit) cables are made up of multiple twisted pairs, all of which lead to individual phone lines and have to be re-connected in the right order - each householder has a unique set of twisted pairs that run from their master socket back to the exchange frames (albeit through a number of flexibility points).


The only other common thing that can take-out multiple lines is flooding - although obviously cables are generally sheathed against this. If an underground cable chamber is flooded however where there are flexibility points things can short out.


Hope things come back on soon for all those without connection.

A promising domain for robotics, possibly, eventually, ...


The issue is matching the pairs - so that the ones going towards the exchange onto subscribers equiment on the main frame are joined to the right ones going towards the subscriber's premises. I am not sure (considering that each severed cable is severed in its own way) that live jointers aren't still better at doing this than robots - obviously testing equipment is used extensively to make sure the correct ends of pairs are jointed together. If it was a JCB job then the jointers will be working in whatever hole in the ground has been created, and dealing with whichever cable type (there are lots) has been damaged. Building and programming robots for all these eventualities is even more non trivial.

A man in the Virgin call centre in Delhi has just advised, in a barely understandable accent, that there is a fault caused by maintenance work that should be fixed between 7 and 8pm tonight.


Failing that I say we get Penguin68 down there with his Black and Decker drill and screwdriver set.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.   
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
    • Still on the look out for CDs and vinyl.. around all weekend 
    • I suggest phoning before you go. I'm going to. It seems to be  only a small place and closed every morning, plus if it's only  one person they might  have to close the shop unexpectedly at other times.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...