Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We missed our cats' vaccinations this past winter. (Please don't judge us! Lots of other things have been happening. My father-in-law was ill then died, hubby working 8 days a week, baby awake 3x a night, etc...) Our vet's advice was rather than give booster immunisations, we should start the immunisation course over again. I agree and was fine with this. So we took our cats in and had the first set of jabs.


That was all fine, but here's where it goes a bit funny, imho. We were supposed to have our cats back for the 2nd set of jabs at three weeks. Hubby and I have been very busy, and I've not been well. So we weren't able to keep the 3 week appointment. We booked them in as soon as we could, but this made for a 5 week gap. Now our vet says that b/c we are 2 weeks late, we will have to restart the immunisation course AGAIN.


My understanding of immunity is that 2 weeks really should not make a significant difference. This seems like a bit of a scam to me. Are we being 'had' by an overzealous vet????


(Also when we had to rebook -- and we said what it was for -- they didn't tell us we'd have to restart the whole course!)

I have no problem with people not vaccinating their pets, but you do have to be aware that you *may* lose them to preventable illnesses.


We weighed up the pros/cons and decided vaccination was the route for us. I just find it hard to believe that we need a re-restart on the immunisation scheme b/c we were 2 weeks off schedule!


My understanding of immunisations (and I am generalising here) is that once your pet (or child etc) has done the initial course, immunity should be very good against specified pathogens. This immunity will then fade over time, more slowly in some indiviudals and for some immunisation types.


I suppose the vet's mandate is to reccommend that all animals get as close to 100% immunity as possible? If we don't re-restart the course, will they just end up with 90% immunity or such?


I'm generally pro-vaccine b/c I believe in disease prevention. But this is torturing my pocketbook, not to mention extra stress for kitties :(


@Ridgley: You can check with Celia Hammond for info on costs etc


xx

I've had every cat I ever had innocluated. I only had yearly boosters with one pet. the boosters made no difference to the life of that pet because it lived to a ripe old age like the others and eventually died from old age. So innonculate yes...boosters? not convinced and have yet to see any evidence they are really that necessary.

I agree with D.J.K Q.Its been the same with cats I have had.

But My cats never went out,being Siamese.

There is an Aids decease that stray cats can pass on to your cat though,it doesnt affect humans in anyway.Only cats.

That is why they reccomend full innoculations.

In fact some catteries will ask for proof of innoculation, before taking your cat in,same thing applies if you want to breed your cat.

,Cat flu, Cat Aids, Lukiemia,etc. P.S. Get Pet plan Insurance to cover vet costs.

I can't add much other than that we have had our dog vaccinated yearly partly for her health but partly that we couldn't leave her at boarding kennels without an updated vaccination certificate; no current vaccine no holiday. I would be the first to admit that it could easily be by-passed if it didn't have family holiday implications and I'm being very honest here.


However I would say the annual health check is reassuring; I hadn't realised that cat's vaccine regimes were so strict, probably because they roam more than dogs who are more under owner control?


I sympathise Saffron. It's hard to know when you do what's best for the pet or what the vet recommends. It's not NHS and most of us I guess don't have private pet insurance.

  • 1 month later...
Initial vaccination courses are vital in both cats and dogs. Enteritis in cats and Parvo in dogs is usually fatal and an awful and preventable way for them to die. You can usually go 4 weeks between the first course with cats, but any later and you do need to restart. The isn't a vaccine against FIV in this country.
I lost my Siamese cat on Christmas Eve last year, he was only 9. He hald his vaccinations as a kitten but nothing after then and died of multiple cancers. If I could go back I would have yearly jabs as you never know.... I still miss him. Better to be safe than sorry....

In the end, we (re)restarted the vacs for only one cat b/c she is younger/gets up to more mischief etc. We simply couldn't afford to (re)restart the vac for our other kitty at present. Our vet agreed with us that this wasn't ideal, but it would be ok. We'll simply restart for kitty 2 when we have the money. I didn't get to speak w the vet, as Hubby took kitty in for vacs.


But what I really wanted to know is what happens from an immunological point of view. Immunisation isn't an all or nothing process. Boosters are required b/c once peak immunisation is acheived, it then gradually wanes, faster for some types of immunity than others. So Kitty 2, who always had up to date vacs until recently, presuably has at least some immunity?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
    • Ah the oldest cliche in the book   ”I would leave if…”   but you wouldn’t leave if farage was prime minister ?
    • It seems we have to accept a certain level of crime as normal now… phone thefts, car thefts, parcels stolen from doorsteps…. they are just recorded as statistics.  When it’s invasive ( numerous home invasions in my street recently), one reported on the forum recently, Evri delivery had his car stolen, the man attacked in PRP a couple of weeks ago, reports of violent and threatening youths also in PRP… it goes on and on.  And now this poor woman brutally assaulted in daylight on a busy street. NONE of this is acceptable. There should be ZERO tolerance for such criminal acts. There is no denying the police have too much to deal with and not enough resources. It’s disgusting. It’s a misappropriation of public funds. More should be invested on our police force.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...