Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree and I've said this on the many previous posts about this. While I'm not saying we should be wreckless, the idea that this crime will be prevented by the victim not using their phone is just silly.


The emphasis is should be on stopping the criminal not putting responsibility on the victim.


It's a mobile phone........MOBILE


DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > failing that, just don't have your phone out

> and

> > keep things in your pockets.

>

> Yep..

> 1st Option.

>

> People should not get their phones out in a

> public place.

>

> Women should not walk down the road alone.

>

> Elderly people should stay in doors and not

> venture out after dark.

>

> Children should not be allowed to play

> outdoors.

>

> Then it would be a lovely world with less

> crime.

>

> 2nd Option.

>

> Catch these Ar*****s and bang them up.

>

> Then our streets really WOULD be a safer

> place.

>

> Stop all this Pussy Footing around.

>

> DulwichFox

In all seriousness - I've never been bothered by these guys (touch wood) - wondering why (or is it just probability and my encounter will happen) as I have my phone out and wander around a lot


I've read looking at gait, body language etc. may have some effect.

Once when I had my old phone, some kids asked me what the time was and burst out laughing when I took my phone out to look.


It was quite funny.


I would presume they think all phones are worth value - which they are, although some more than others.

Fortunately I have never had my phone stolen. If you report the phone stolen doesn't your provider switch it off and then the crim has to go and get it 'unlocked' or something? If so, the creeps that unlock stolen phones should be shut down because they are creating the market by enabling the phones

Oh, going to be big hated for this but...nobody's to blame for having their telephone stolen, the moped gangs are scum. Filth. But do we need to carry around and use ?800 telephones? I have a 'phone which costs me a tenner a month, it does all the bells and whistles, good luck to any twat who nicks it...I wouldn't stroll around wearing a ?50K Rolex either...


Not excusing the horrible criminals but what's the point in carrying mad expensive shit around when a cheap thing can do the same job?

geh Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Err, not sure they can see whether you have the

> latest model or an old brick prior to snatching it

> from your hand?


Err, not talking individually but as a society, if generally the odds were they'd be getting something worth a tenner they wouldn't bother.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, going to be big hated for this but...nobody's

> to blame for having their telephone stolen, the

> moped gangs are scum. Filth. But do we need to

> carry around and use ?800 telephones? I have a

> 'phone which costs me a tenner a month, it does

> all the bells and whistles, good luck to any twat

> who nicks it...I wouldn't stroll around wearing a

> ?50K Rolex either...

>

> Not excusing the horrible criminals but what's the

> point in carrying mad expensive shit around when a

> cheap thing can do the same job?


I like my iPhone (personal one) and I will get iPhone8 too


Work provides iPhones as standard too.

Some boys watching me walking down the road last night (Peckham Road/Bellenden - where it's quiet).

Hands outstretched (like I own this place) - even did a spin - they probably just thought I was mad. Gait watching :.


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n0JpAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA227&lpg=PA227&dq=gait+watching&source=bl&ots=4IEPNHlwDt&sig=2GPlaiitR-h6xaIMONf-T-KlZxM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCz97yg_LVAhXFA8AKHaqaDukQ6AEIZjAO#v=onepage&q=gait%20watching&f=false

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I like my iPhone (personal one) and I will get

> iPhone8 too

>

> Work provides iPhones as standard too.


Fair enough, I like good technology too, and nothing wrong with having it, but I wouldn't, for example, carry my Macbook around uncovered in the street because it'd be asking for trouble. I know that it's giving in to the buggers to some extent, but really I think it would be best to postpone that oh-so-important call or webpage check until in a safer environment.

I wasn't going to report it but after the comments, I did call 101 and they've logged it and are sending a police officer round on Tuesday. That seems a little superfluous when nothing actually got stolen but that's their protocol.


I guess we just have to be careful about having our phones out and be aware of who's around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...