Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've only lived in this area for the last 25 years so I can't say what it was like 40 years ago, and I'm not quite sure what makes the Irish community 'ethnic' but I'm certain that they've never been a pre-dominant group.


Otherwise, I agree with Marmora man,

"There's "nice to have" and "must have" categories in council spending -the Irish Festival falls squarely in the former category."

No-one here has been able to verify the Irish origins of the event, I'm part Irish but would agree this is not a particularly 'Irish area' in terms of immigrant profile. I suspect most of us have simply enjoyed it as a well attended fun event.


I have no idea at all how much Southwark council stumps up for the event; I'm sure I'm not the only one to have given it too much thought but I appreciate that budget cuts must be made.


To me it's a shame it has to go and who knows if it will ever return?

Could the organisers not get sponsorship from some appropriate organisation/s, eg Guinness or something, rather than depending on council funding?


It's not like it is a huge festival, after all, the costs of running it can't be that enormous?


I know everyone is strapped for cash, but businesses are still sponsoring events.


That could turn the festival into a win-win situation for everybody.


ETA: As well as the festival PeckhamRose mentions above, there will be a second Aquarius Festival this year - bigger and better and on a non-clashing date this time :))

I know that some of our residents are planning to look into other ways of having some kind of Irish Festival even if it's a scaled down event. I also wonder if some previous events could be combined into one event too. That surely would be a cheaper way of having something.
East Dulwich was certainly an "Irish" area - we still have the Irish shop on the highstreet, and the EDT was an Irish pub when I moved into the area, not in the sense of an O'Neils but in a "Republican Times on the bar" and a "Don't wear an England Shirt" way, hence the origins of the festival
I for one shan't be lamenting the loss of the Irish Festival. The thought of of sweating gingery Irish folk (and assorted wannabes) clad in bright green man-made fibres and drinking warm Guinness whilst listening to "tiddly-tee" music is more than one could bear. I come from a gingery-Scots background - we don't feel the need to have festivals celebrating our Scots heritage. What's the attraction of these things???
Actually, you're right Sue. My description was wholly based on a vague generalisation and crude stereotyping of all things Irish. So there wasn't any bright green clothing, warm Guinness or "tiddly-tee" music??? If not I take it all back. (But it would seem rather pointless to hold an Irish festival without any of the foregoing??) So in your own words Sue, what WAS the attraction of this festival and why should we lament its demise??

oilworker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, you're right Sue. My description was

> wholly based on a vague generalisation and crude

> stereotyping of all things Irish. So there wasn't

> any bright green clothing, warm Guinness or

> "tiddly-tee" music??? If not I take it all back.

> (But it would seem rather pointless to hold an

> Irish festival without any of the foregoing??) So

> in your own words Sue, what WAS the attraction of

> this festival and why should we lament its

> demise??


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I just object to people criticising and stereotyping without any basis.


I've only been to this festival once - it was OK. I think anything which gets the community together is a good thing. Sorry if you disagree :-S

Although East Dulwich is not a predominantly Irish area there has always been a very strong Irish community here.


Southwark Irish Cultural Arts & Development Centre is run by a team of dedicated volunteers who seek to promote participation in Irish arts, culture and sport - http://www.southwarkirish.com/about_us.html


SICAD?s website states, ?Irish Festival part funded by Southwark Council & Emigrants Support Programme in conjunction with the Irish Government? http://www.dfa.ie/home/index.aspx?id=292


Dulwich is also home to the Dulwich Harps Gaelic Football team ? one of the oldest in London - http://www.dulwich-harps.com/index.php You may have seen Niall McCann from the team on BBC Breakfast recently discussing handball and the 2012 Olympics. Incidentally the goalposts on the Rye belong to the team.


The Southwark Irish Festival is not about ?sweating gingery Irish folk (and assorted wannabes) clad in bright green man-made fibres and drinking warm Guinness whilst listening to "tiddly-tee" music?. The Saturday was a celebration of Gaelic Games (football, hurling & camogie) and the Sunday always started with an open-air mass led by the Bishop of Southwark followed by dancing and music.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now I know what the festivals I go to have been

> lacking.. an open air mass.

>

> Would the Bishop of Southwark be available for the

> Secret Garden Party? How do I get in touch?



I know you're joking, but http://www.rcsouthwark.co.uk/bishops.html

That's the problem with religion philiphenslowe, it's very divisive ;-)


I'm all for the Irish doing whatever they want to do to celebrate whatever they feel is important. Just not on the taxpayer. Can't believe they ever paid for it. They'd be within their rights to ask the Irish for their money back.


If the Brits did it it would be called 'cultural imperialism'.


Can you imagine the Irish funding an English festival?

Nothing wrong with it at all.


It simply shouldn't be paid for by people who don't want to go. Does your neighbour pay for your dinner parties?


Besides which, the Irish government doesn't contribute because they want people in ED to have a fun afternoon, they pay for it because it's a marketing opportunity.


Why should the taxpayer be funding an Irish advertising campaign?


I'm surprised that anyone's really trying to justify this.

Huguenot Wrote:

--

> Why should the taxpayer be funding an Irish

> advertising campaign?

>


xxxxxx


It isn't an Irish advertising campaign, FFS.


It's a community event. For people living in the area. Whether they are Irish or not.


Jesus wept.


ETA: Let's ban all forms of public enjoyment while we're at it, why don't we.


ETA: And I'm not suggesting the council should continue to subsidise this given the cuts they have to make, hence my earlier post suggesting an alternative.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers Special Needs Journal. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...