Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If people like Loz ( who uses a fake name to hide behind) are going to use this forum I would prefer it, if they would not troll every post with acidic and trollish remarks. Atleast read the previous posts before commenting. I should of guessed you was an avid Viz reader who never really grew up and probably still lives at home with his mother, or is married with a wife who hardley notices him at all, as he plays video games constantly and ignores her when he's with his mates. I can see that your pseudonym ''Loz'' sounds like slang for ''loss'' or ''lost''- either way get a life.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > No, NO sympathy for the postman, I don't

> appreciate junk mail,

> > does the PO not understand they are

> proliferating a mountain of waste paper

>

> It's not the PO, it's Royal Mail. Has anyone told

> HMQ what's being done in her name?

>

> Though apparently you are able to opt out:

> https://personal.help.royalmail.com/app/answers/de

> tail/a_id/293/~/how-do-i-opt-out-of-receiving-any-

> leaflets-or-unaddressed-promotional-material/, on

> an all-or-none basis. Would there be anything

> important or interesting that you'd no longer get?

> Which stuff would you still get anyway, from

> private distributors?


That's handy, thanks, I was wondering if there was a way of stopping it. Not only do I object to the environmental waste - my recycling bin is in the porch and that's where it all goes, unread - but it makes me feel sorry for the posties. Having done the odd Christmas shift as a student I know what a pain it is to have a bundle of junk mail which forces one to go up every driveway even when they have no personal mail.

Selclene Southeast Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If people like Loz ( who uses a fake name to hide behind) are going to use this forum I would prefer

> it, if they would not troll every post with acidic and trollish remarks. Atleast read the previous

> posts before commenting. I should of guessed you was an avid Viz reader who never really grew up

> and probably still lives at home with his mother, or is married with a wife who hardley notices him

> at all, as he plays video games constantly and ignores her when he's with his mates. I can see

> that your pseudonym ''Loz'' sounds like slang for ''loss'' or ''lost''- either way get a life.


And 'Selclene' sounds like it's a name conjured up by some illiterate who wants to come in, 'clene up' all your valuable goods and 'sel' them on eBay.


But, in one way you are correct - I am, indeed, anonymous. Whereas you are making your business look like an bunch of intolerant and abusive idiots. Just the sort of people you really don't want holding the keys to your house.


This *is* going well for you, isn't it? It's like a crash course in 'destroying your business - marketing for imbeciles'.


Does Selclene know you are tarnishing their brand so deftly?

Selclene Southeast Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> We have been posting quite safely, honestly and

> openly without trolling others with abusive

> comments and snide remarks.


Really? Which thread was that? Because you've been quite abusive on this one. Not just to me, but others as well.


If they search on this site or maybe even google "Selclene East Dulwich", this is probably going to pop up. You really think your attitude here is going to pull in new customers for you?

A handful of recycling just came through my letterbox (hint to leafletters: when you do this after dark the householder's first thought is that you're a burglar). It included this gem:


'Seen this leaflet? So will your customers! Would you like more customers? Leaflet distribution is the solution!' I'll spare you the excessive use of capital letters.


Side 2 is recruiting delivery people.


If anyone would like to take it up with them, the company claims to be local and is called DOR-2-DOR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's taken time to see the legacy of Thatcher's free market policy but we're really seeing it now with utilities, housing and infrastructure 😢.  I think I've remembered correctly that on Dirty Business they said we are the only country in the world to have our water supply totally privately owned.   When it gets taken back into public ownership the private owners will rub their hands together with glee having withdrawn massive profits and bonuses over the last 30 + years, let the infrastructure go to pot and now have the taxpayer come back in after this long period of neglect and pay for the failing systems to be rebuilt.  If you think those companies will suffer at the hands of government then you have more faith than I.  Thatcherism has a lot to answer for ☹️  
    • what's scandalous is our government allowing it. The should and can impose fines and order works which would lead to TW becoming bankrupt, at which point it can be taken back into the public domain.
    • The privatisation of water is just ridiculous. I have the Safer seas and rivers service app on my phone (recommend it if you like to swim outside) and the regular (weekly) sewage dumps highlighted all along the south coast is just outrageous.
    • That's a disgusting slur against an innocent driver who was probably just on their way to drop off freshly-baked muffins at an orphanage when they had to swerve out of the way of a so-called "cyclist", and anyway traffic lights are just a Marxist conspiracy by Southwark Council to slow traffic down and force people out of cars, so we're all better off without it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...