Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A cautionary tale. I left a load of clothes and shoes in bags by my front door this morning (too long and boring to explain why). My 11-year-old son answered a knock on the door from somebody who asked 'Are these for charity'. Gawd bless him he said yes, and half our wardrobe disappeared. I won't pollute the forum with what I think of chancing b***** who'd take the word of a child rather than ask to speak to an adult, but I'd point out that these WEREN'T on the street and there was no indication they were going to be dumped, so I'd advise people to be careful.

Well ... your son did say they were for charity. Why did he do that?


Whoever it was who took them (and of course they could have been thieving bastards) took his word for it that you, as a household, no longer wanted them. At least he knocked on the door and asked :)

No, they asked if it was 'for charity' and he, a child, said yes, because he didn't quite understand and was intimidated by two adults - and afterwards was very upset. And they didn't have to take his word, they could have asked if there was an adult in the house. I wouldn't have done that ... would you? So I'm not sure, Loz, which bit is 'unbelievable' - I'd save your moral indignation for a more deserving cause. It was just intended as a warning to other people.
There's also the point that they quite obviously WEREN'T charity collectors ... though a child wouldn't know that. So coming on to somebody's property, taking stuff without the permission of the homeowner (and suggesting falsely to a child that they're collecting for charity) - yes I think that qualifies as theft.

What surprises me about this is that they knocked on the door. I'm tempted to give them some benefit of the doubt as this seems a bit too honest. If they were simply intent on thieving they wouldn't have bothered to knock. Although unlikely, I don't quite understand why it's so certain that they weren't charity collectors (perhaps there is something the OP hasn't mentioned). We regularly get plastic bags put through the door from reputable charities asking for donations (last one was less than a fortnight ago) and from past experience the collectors aren't always timely. I stopped leaving donations in this way simply because I didn't want an uncollected bag sat outside my house for weeks on end.


And I have to admit that I would have expected an 11 year old to be capable of answering that sort of question or, if unsure of themselves, to call for a parent rather than giving an answer to a stranger.


I wonder if perhaps the OP was just very unfortunate.

An 11 year old will say whatever an adult will want them to say if the adult is manipulative.


Sally81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i'm more intrigued about why they were left there,

> if they weren't for the bin, for charity, or you

> weren't off on a trip (which your son would have

> probably known.)....bagged up the other half's

> stuff in temper? ; )

Perhaps thieving was a bit strong ... I was very annoyed last night. Let's just say 'seriously opportunistic' and not bothering about the niceties. It was an open-top truck with scrap on it according to my younger son ... so I think we can be certain they WEREN'T charity collectors, but I should move on. But I do remember a friend having their buggy pinched from the front garden in Friern Road a few years back, and somebody else had some kids' shoes nicked from out the front - now that is tight!

A bit back my husband and I sat for hours waiting for a van to arrive to load a metal shed we'd sold. The woman who had bought the shed was waiting with us for this van she'd hired. She walked away for the briefest moment and exactly then a van arrived, pointed to the shed and we, thinking: Finally! said Yes. In 30 seconds the shed was on the van and the van was pulling off when the woman came back and in that instant we knew it was the wrong van. The shed was taken off the van as I yelled at the driver.


And another story: a friend gave me an old tin washing tub. Quite nice. I left it out front right up by the house ready for planting. Well you know the rest.. off it went in a van to be sold on for scrap.


Don't leave anything of value in front of your house.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...