Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This wonderful Victorian property with four bedrooms plus a study room, is situated in the very popular Dunstans Road, just a short walk to Goodrich School, Dulwich Library and the great local amenities of East Dulwich. Call haart to arrange a viewing.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW, this has made me realise how utterly helpless

> and unsupported you are as a victim of crimes that

> don't involve violence, lots of money or something

> media-worthy. Another example of how ordinary

> people count for nothing other than as the

> politician's favourite placebo phrase 'hardworking

> families'.

>

> The Victim Support website doesn't even include

> theft in its list of crimes.


Victim support do excellent work in supporting those who are left traumatised by crime. Like many charities, they are probably stretched at the best of times. At King's, they provide the independent domestic violence advisors service. Realistically they are not going to have the capacity to help out with a pair of lost glasses in Dulwich library.

Spaceat61 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The library staff were kind at the time and helped me to phone the police (obviously I had no phone

> to do it myself) but the library has no CCTV in the bathroom lobby area so there was never any use

> in the police looking over the library CCTV anyway.


You could have a high-definition picture of the person holding their passport id page in one hand and their drivers' licence in the other and the police still probably wouldn't take any interest...


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW, this has made me realise how utterly helpless and unsupported you are as a victim of crimes that

> don't involve violence, lots of money or something media-worthy.


... because, in my experience, that is pretty much the criteria they decide what is worth sending someone out to investigate.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spaceat61 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > The library staff were kind at the time and

> helped me to phone the police (obviously I had no

> phone

> > to do it myself) but the library has no CCTV in

> the bathroom lobby area so there was never any

> use

> > in the police looking over the library CCTV

> anyway.

>

> You could have a high-definition picture of the

> person holding their passport id page in one hand

> and their drivers' licence in the other and the

> police still probably wouldn't take any

> interest...

>

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > BTW, this has made me realise how utterly

> helpless and unsupported you are as a victim of

> crimes that

> > don't involve violence, lots of money or

> something media-worthy.

>

> ... because, in my experience, that is pretty much

> the criteria they decide what is worth sending

> someone out to investigate.


Hate crimes must be investigate (not that this could be put in that category)


But for anyone who is a victim of a crime involving hate it's worth knowing.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Calm down it's a pair of glasses annoying, yes

> but hardly makes s library a hotbed of crime or a

> remotely sensible place for a pc to be based.



A friend of mine had his glasses stolen and whilst waiting for the new pair to be made he fell and hit his head. Glasses are like gold and if stolen should be treated as if a shop had been raided. Although some people have left their glasses in church and never went back for them.

Not sure if I'd go that far but they're a very personal thing in that most of us spend a long time choosing the frames, then getting exactly the right fit to your head and then getting used to the prescription. As mine were bifocals and I used them for everything except distance I'm now swapping from one poundland pair to another and back again, and as neither is quite right and my eyes have slightly different prescriptions I'm getting headaches adjusting.


So not a big disaster in the great scheme of things (message to the universe: I don't need proof of that thank you) but a problem nonetheless.

lavender27 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Calm down it's a pair of glasses annoying, yes

> > but hardly makes s library a hotbed of crime or

> a

> > remotely sensible place for a pc to be based.

>

>

> A friend of mine had his glasses stolen and whilst

> waiting for the new pair to be made he fell and

> hit his head. Glasses are like gold and if stolen

> should be treated as if a shop had been raided.

> Although some people have left their glasses in

> church and never went back for them.


I'm beginning to think it's just me that paid ?500


I'd be really annoyed if I lost them.

Not theft, but an unpleasant man using a computer today was chuntering away somewhat threateningly to a woman (who may or may not have given him reason to be annoyed). When he swore I asked him to stop and he got all huffy and stood up and asked me to keep my nose out, which said it was my business if me and other people were being disturbed by unsuitable language. I told a librarian about thirty feet away and he twigged and then started off all over again, swaggering and the like, so I told him I had said my peace and was leaving. The library staff have a lot to put up with...
As well as being a library, it acts as a study hall, a place to access the digital word, education and services, a community centre and somewhere warm and dry for people to go and sit for a while without having to buy anything. I think that's strengthened its value but it does mean you get all sorts.

> I'm now swapping from one poundland pair to another and

> back again, and as neither is quite right and my eyes have

> slightly different prescriptions I'm getting headaches adjusting.


Cannibalise a pair from two Poundland pairs matching your L & R lens strengths respectively?

Both eyes are different and need different prescriptions for reading and computer. Plus the poundland ones are the same thickness all the way across whereas prescription ones for me would be thicker in the middle and thinner at the edges, the opposite of short-sighted.


Finally had a new eye test and got the cheapest reasonably viable combination, but still over ?200. Went to a Boots where they gave me 25% off - unbelievably kind and I was very grateful.

My last-but-one pair came from Surrey Quays Tesco and either an arm or a nose pad fell off about once a week the entire three years I had them, which put me off going for the absolute cheapest, sorry to say.
I buy Sainsbury's reading glasses (about ?8, some perfectly good rimless styles) and have them relensed by CilliaryBlue (online company, just send them the glasses and your prescription (prescription obtained from whatever optician's doing free tests) for ?15 and they last well past the time it's time to get a new perscription. I'm not a cheap person, honest, but I balk at paying ?200 for frames which are, ultimately, a few pieces of bent wire with a logo stamped on them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...