Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could you advise the dates of the next 3 Saturday

> home matches, Can never figure out details on web

> site?


Next home matches:


Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League

I wonder how likely it is that Meadows will just apply for and get retrospective planning permission ?


Does anyone understand - and can explain to me - Meadow's motives in these v hostile acts ?


registering DHFC trademarks etc

locking them out of the ground

erecting fences

restricting access


It may be obvious but I can't see what they gain out of it ?

Is it the demise of DHFC ?


Um ,but why the fences ? Some long term plan of adverse possession ?

eastdulwichhenry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next home matches:

>

> Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

> Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

> Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

> Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

> Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

> Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League


The Dorking Wanderers game has been move forward to Good Friday, March 30, at 15:00

Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they would be able to build the flats on the stadium site as per their original plan.... but now they have p***ed the community off there is no way they will get permission. They should have taken Rio Ferdinand's offer.

Amanda1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they

> would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> site as per their original plan.... but now they

> have p***ed the community off there is no way they

> will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> Ferdinand's offer.


Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they just cutting their nose to spite their face?

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amanda1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless

> they

> > would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> > site as per their original plan.... but now

> they

> > have p***ed the community off there is no way

> they

> > will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> > Ferdinand's offer.

>

> Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they

> just cutting their nose to spite their face?



I believe they value it in or around 13m and Rio only offered a measly 10m

> what time this debate will be?


It's an adjournment debate*. Last half hour of the sitting.


* Explained here:https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/debates/adjournment/. Friday sittings are said at http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/calendar/#jump-link-2 to be from 9.30am to 3pm, though presumably they can run late or early. It'll be in Hansard pretty soon anyway.


It should also be viewable on BBC Parliamentary channel, freeview 232.

I believe it was scheduled for 2.30


DHFC statement

" Helen Hayes MP's adjournment debate on our situation scheduled for 2:30pm in the House of Commons on Friday (16th),"


http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/news/club-statement-15032018-2216519.html

Well I for one thought it was very good. Helen Hayes made a strong and impassioned speech with good support from her own benches. The Minister for Sport knows the club (she saw games there when she lived in Herne Hill) and was very supportive and my understanding was that unless Southwark, the Club and the developers could sort it out she would appoint someone to do it. Well done Helen Hayes for bringing it to such national attention. I'm not making any political point at all but we appear to have a first class constituency MP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...