Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could you advise the dates of the next 3 Saturday

> home matches, Can never figure out details on web

> site?


Next home matches:


Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League

I wonder how likely it is that Meadows will just apply for and get retrospective planning permission ?


Does anyone understand - and can explain to me - Meadow's motives in these v hostile acts ?


registering DHFC trademarks etc

locking them out of the ground

erecting fences

restricting access


It may be obvious but I can't see what they gain out of it ?

Is it the demise of DHFC ?


Um ,but why the fences ? Some long term plan of adverse possession ?

eastdulwichhenry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next home matches:

>

> Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

> Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

> Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

> Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

> Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

> Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League


The Dorking Wanderers game has been move forward to Good Friday, March 30, at 15:00

Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they would be able to build the flats on the stadium site as per their original plan.... but now they have p***ed the community off there is no way they will get permission. They should have taken Rio Ferdinand's offer.

Amanda1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they

> would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> site as per their original plan.... but now they

> have p***ed the community off there is no way they

> will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> Ferdinand's offer.


Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they just cutting their nose to spite their face?

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amanda1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless

> they

> > would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> > site as per their original plan.... but now

> they

> > have p***ed the community off there is no way

> they

> > will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> > Ferdinand's offer.

>

> Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they

> just cutting their nose to spite their face?



I believe they value it in or around 13m and Rio only offered a measly 10m

> what time this debate will be?


It's an adjournment debate*. Last half hour of the sitting.


* Explained here:https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/debates/adjournment/. Friday sittings are said at http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/calendar/#jump-link-2 to be from 9.30am to 3pm, though presumably they can run late or early. It'll be in Hansard pretty soon anyway.


It should also be viewable on BBC Parliamentary channel, freeview 232.

I believe it was scheduled for 2.30


DHFC statement

" Helen Hayes MP's adjournment debate on our situation scheduled for 2:30pm in the House of Commons on Friday (16th),"


http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/news/club-statement-15032018-2216519.html

Well I for one thought it was very good. Helen Hayes made a strong and impassioned speech with good support from her own benches. The Minister for Sport knows the club (she saw games there when she lived in Herne Hill) and was very supportive and my understanding was that unless Southwark, the Club and the developers could sort it out she would appoint someone to do it. Well done Helen Hayes for bringing it to such national attention. I'm not making any political point at all but we appear to have a first class constituency MP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...