Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could you advise the dates of the next 3 Saturday

> home matches, Can never figure out details on web

> site?


Next home matches:


Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League

I wonder how likely it is that Meadows will just apply for and get retrospective planning permission ?


Does anyone understand - and can explain to me - Meadow's motives in these v hostile acts ?


registering DHFC trademarks etc

locking them out of the ground

erecting fences

restricting access


It may be obvious but I can't see what they gain out of it ?

Is it the demise of DHFC ?


Um ,but why the fences ? Some long term plan of adverse possession ?

eastdulwichhenry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next home matches:

>

> Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

> Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

> Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

> Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

> Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

> Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League


The Dorking Wanderers game has been move forward to Good Friday, March 30, at 15:00

Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they would be able to build the flats on the stadium site as per their original plan.... but now they have p***ed the community off there is no way they will get permission. They should have taken Rio Ferdinand's offer.

Amanda1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they

> would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> site as per their original plan.... but now they

> have p***ed the community off there is no way they

> will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> Ferdinand's offer.


Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they just cutting their nose to spite their face?

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amanda1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless

> they

> > would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> > site as per their original plan.... but now

> they

> > have p***ed the community off there is no way

> they

> > will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> > Ferdinand's offer.

>

> Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they

> just cutting their nose to spite their face?



I believe they value it in or around 13m and Rio only offered a measly 10m

> what time this debate will be?


It's an adjournment debate*. Last half hour of the sitting.


* Explained here:https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/debates/adjournment/. Friday sittings are said at http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/calendar/#jump-link-2 to be from 9.30am to 3pm, though presumably they can run late or early. It'll be in Hansard pretty soon anyway.


It should also be viewable on BBC Parliamentary channel, freeview 232.

I believe it was scheduled for 2.30


DHFC statement

" Helen Hayes MP's adjournment debate on our situation scheduled for 2:30pm in the House of Commons on Friday (16th),"


http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/news/club-statement-15032018-2216519.html

Well I for one thought it was very good. Helen Hayes made a strong and impassioned speech with good support from her own benches. The Minister for Sport knows the club (she saw games there when she lived in Herne Hill) and was very supportive and my understanding was that unless Southwark, the Club and the developers could sort it out she would appoint someone to do it. Well done Helen Hayes for bringing it to such national attention. I'm not making any political point at all but we appear to have a first class constituency MP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A lot of this is down to why the high street came into being in the first place  consumer demand  And now times has changed and consumers behave differently.  And businesses adapt to that.  It’s a bottom up approach as opposed to something imposed upon us.   It’s not to my tastes. But what do people expect to happen.  Jazzer is on to something when he says boycott Amazon - but the reality is even many who boycott Amazon choose other or more ethical alternatives. But still online  going into town for “a shop” just isn’t what people do anymore  Yeah but that’s not a real comparison. And “for ill” glosses over a lot of wrong as well  but we live in 2025 now and any of us oldies who think when we were 20 was the best time ever, a time we should go back to are just pining for our youths  there is no country in the world that can turn back the clock.  So in 2025, where is the closest vision of somewhere you would like.  Because if you look globally you don’t just get capitalism.  You can choose dictatorships or communism too 
    • Kramer is great, met her a couple of times.  Told her the story of when she ran for Mayor and didn't attend a community event as she didn't want to spoil Ken (Livingstone)'s love in.  Amused me and her no doubt 
    • I remember when all this was fields. The United Kingdom between 1945 and 1979. For good and ill.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...