Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could you advise the dates of the next 3 Saturday

> home matches, Can never figure out details on web

> site?


Next home matches:


Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League

I wonder how likely it is that Meadows will just apply for and get retrospective planning permission ?


Does anyone understand - and can explain to me - Meadow's motives in these v hostile acts ?


registering DHFC trademarks etc

locking them out of the ground

erecting fences

restricting access


It may be obvious but I can't see what they gain out of it ?

Is it the demise of DHFC ?


Um ,but why the fences ? Some long term plan of adverse possession ?

eastdulwichhenry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next home matches:

>

> Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

> Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

> Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

> Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

> Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

> Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League


The Dorking Wanderers game has been move forward to Good Friday, March 30, at 15:00

Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they would be able to build the flats on the stadium site as per their original plan.... but now they have p***ed the community off there is no way they will get permission. They should have taken Rio Ferdinand's offer.

Amanda1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they

> would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> site as per their original plan.... but now they

> have p***ed the community off there is no way they

> will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> Ferdinand's offer.


Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they just cutting their nose to spite their face?

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amanda1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless

> they

> > would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> > site as per their original plan.... but now

> they

> > have p***ed the community off there is no way

> they

> > will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> > Ferdinand's offer.

>

> Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they

> just cutting their nose to spite their face?



I believe they value it in or around 13m and Rio only offered a measly 10m

> what time this debate will be?


It's an adjournment debate*. Last half hour of the sitting.


* Explained here:https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/debates/adjournment/. Friday sittings are said at http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/calendar/#jump-link-2 to be from 9.30am to 3pm, though presumably they can run late or early. It'll be in Hansard pretty soon anyway.


It should also be viewable on BBC Parliamentary channel, freeview 232.

I believe it was scheduled for 2.30


DHFC statement

" Helen Hayes MP's adjournment debate on our situation scheduled for 2:30pm in the House of Commons on Friday (16th),"


http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/news/club-statement-15032018-2216519.html

Well I for one thought it was very good. Helen Hayes made a strong and impassioned speech with good support from her own benches. The Minister for Sport knows the club (she saw games there when she lived in Herne Hill) and was very supportive and my understanding was that unless Southwark, the Club and the developers could sort it out she would appoint someone to do it. Well done Helen Hayes for bringing it to such national attention. I'm not making any political point at all but we appear to have a first class constituency MP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...