Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mary123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could you advise the dates of the next 3 Saturday

> home matches, Can never figure out details on web

> site?


Next home matches:


Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League

I wonder how likely it is that Meadows will just apply for and get retrospective planning permission ?


Does anyone understand - and can explain to me - Meadow's motives in these v hostile acts ?


registering DHFC trademarks etc

locking them out of the ground

erecting fences

restricting access


It may be obvious but I can't see what they gain out of it ?

Is it the demise of DHFC ?


Um ,but why the fences ? Some long term plan of adverse possession ?

eastdulwichhenry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next home matches:

>

> Sun 18, 15:00, Worthing, League

> Wed 28, 19:45, Balham, Cup

> Sat 31, 15:00, Dorking Wanderers, League

> Tue 10 April, 19:45, Tonbridge Angels, League

> Sat 14 April, 15:00, Thurrock, League

> Sat 28 April, 15:00, Margate, League


The Dorking Wanderers game has been move forward to Good Friday, March 30, at 15:00

Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they would be able to build the flats on the stadium site as per their original plan.... but now they have p***ed the community off there is no way they will get permission. They should have taken Rio Ferdinand's offer.

Amanda1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless they

> would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> site as per their original plan.... but now they

> have p***ed the community off there is no way they

> will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> Ferdinand's offer.


Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they just cutting their nose to spite their face?

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amanda1979 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Maybe they thought if the ground is worthless

> they

> > would be able to build the flats on the stadium

> > site as per their original plan.... but now

> they

> > have p***ed the community off there is no way

> they

> > will get permission. They should have taken Rio

> > Ferdinand's offer.

>

> Yeah why didn't they take Rio's offer? Were they

> just cutting their nose to spite their face?



I believe they value it in or around 13m and Rio only offered a measly 10m

> what time this debate will be?


It's an adjournment debate*. Last half hour of the sitting.


* Explained here:https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/business/debates/adjournment/. Friday sittings are said at http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/calendar/#jump-link-2 to be from 9.30am to 3pm, though presumably they can run late or early. It'll be in Hansard pretty soon anyway.


It should also be viewable on BBC Parliamentary channel, freeview 232.

I believe it was scheduled for 2.30


DHFC statement

" Helen Hayes MP's adjournment debate on our situation scheduled for 2:30pm in the House of Commons on Friday (16th),"


http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/news/club-statement-15032018-2216519.html

Well I for one thought it was very good. Helen Hayes made a strong and impassioned speech with good support from her own benches. The Minister for Sport knows the club (she saw games there when she lived in Herne Hill) and was very supportive and my understanding was that unless Southwark, the Club and the developers could sort it out she would appoint someone to do it. Well done Helen Hayes for bringing it to such national attention. I'm not making any political point at all but we appear to have a first class constituency MP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I very much hope 'social cleansing' is not on the cards - the great value of Peckham is its rich mix of people both living and visiting the areas. If you mean removal or discouragement of criminal activity (including vandalism) then I would agree of course - and I would be very much in favour of actual cleaning in the area - the fact that Peckham is 'mixed class' is a good thing, surely (which is what 'social cleansing' often refers to). Kings Cross (which stimulated this part of the debate) had a very significant prostitution and drugs culture - with some elements of rack-renting and significant criminality. It was also far more 'run-down' and over a wider area) than the area around our station - even if that could do with more investment.
    • Yet we can. Given the development of the shopping centre, the expensive flats, lack of social hosing, closure of the stalls and hairdressers around the station to make room for the new square, I think it's quite clear where this is going.   It's not improving the area for the existing, its removal of the existing to make it better for the upgrade of the area. 
    • Week 33 fixtures...   Saturday 10th May Fulham v Everton Ipswich Town v Brentford Southampton v Manchester City Wolverhampton Wanderers v Brighton & Hove Albion AFC Bournemouth v Aston Villa   Sunday 11th May Newcastle United v Chelsea Manchester United v West Ham United Nottingham Forest v Leicester City Tottenham Hotspur v Crystal Palace Liverpool v Arsenal
    • Ohh I am not sure.  Maybe you have seen the wood through the trees. , 🌴 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...