Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Hadley Group suggest that a new ground of astroturf would mean they could rent it out 50-60 hours per week rather than current 5-6 hours. That they'd include two Multi Use Games Areas which could also be rented out. That these together would enable a better income stream.

The flip side is they'll have built 200+ homes to recoup the ?6M they've spent so far on buying the grounds and club.


Their plan depends on building on open land the current football grounds. But they have employed Bellenden serious PR people to try and make it happen.

Years ago (so I may be out of the loop) the current astroturf area used to be used every day/night of the week for kids and adult football matches/training. It could also be used as a full length pitch if required,if I remember correctly. I presume that's still the case. So they would get rid of an existing astroturf area and replace it with another one and this will increase income. How? Do they know there is going to be additional demand for it?


What's to stop them turning the current pitch of the football club into an astroturf one? Is it the building of houses they are more interested in? If so, once that's finished and they have made their money, why would they care about the football club?

The current Hamlet pitch could of course be turned into 4g astroturf and the site could turn a modest profit. I suspect this is not the ?100 million payday that Hadley have in mind though.


I hope the Council stand strong, execute their plan to improve the astroturf pitches, and increase not decrease the available community sports facilities.

I like this quote from Bellenden on their website:


"We are acutely aware of the strict regulations around consultation from the Planning Inspectorate and have a successful track record of exceeding these requirements when submissions are made."


As James says, they are a serious PR group.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Years ago (so I may be out of the loop) the

> current astroturf area used to be used every

> day/night of the week for kids and adult football

> matches/training. It could also be used as a full

> length pitch if required,if I remember correctly.

> I presume that's still the case. So they would get

> rid of an existing astroturf area and replace it

> with another one and this will increase income.

> How? Do they know there is going to be additional

> demand for it?

>

> What's to stop them turning the current pitch of

> the football club into an astroturf one? Is it the

> building of houses they are more interested in? If

> so, once that's finished and they have made their

> money, why would they care about the football

> club?


Having a new stadium with community facilities has been a source of much-needed increased revenue for many football clubs. The current astroturf is outdated and in bad condition. By getting rid of it and creating a new playing surface it'll create a more desirable sports facility for local people, clubs, schools etc.


They can't simply put the new astroturf pitch in the existing stadium, as Hadley wish to use that land for building homes. Naturally, Hadley didn't get into this to be charitable, and haven't said they wish to run the club forever. Hadley's solution does seem to benefit everyone, however. They're a property developer so it is the building of houses that they're interested in. Once that's done and the football club has a new home, I believe the hope would be for the football club to adopt a fan ownership model.

But Gary, Southwark Council have already allocated the money and are going to upgrade the current astroturf pitch since it's current lease holders have allowed it to fall into disrepair.


Hadley is not offering to add a facility it is trying to garner public support to remove one.


Investing in a 4g pitch for the Champion Hill Stadium would increase conservatively eightfold the time the pitch could be used each week. Thus bringing in new, significant, year round revenue streams to the stadium. It would also greatly reduce upkeep costs and reduce the losses from wet weather cancellations. Sure it is not the profit they can make bulldozing it and then selling 200 new homes, but I fail to see how it is in the public interest to change planning policy to help them make a pile of cash.

From January this year and why 3g/4g is a no goer at present


"It?s tight at the top of the Ryman League Premier Division. With a little less than half of the season left to play, just seven points seperate the top six clubs in the table and it remains, for now at least, anybody?s guess who from Kingstonian, Maidstone United, Wealdstone, Dulwich Hamlet, Bognor Regis Town or AFC Hornchurch will be taking a place in the Conference South. Indeed, one of these clubs will not even make the division?s play-offs come the end of the season. Out of that six, though, there is one club that will be furrowing the brows of people at the Football Association and the Football Conference more than their competitors at the moment, because at the moment one of those clubs could yet earn promotion on the pitch, only to be subsequently denied it at a committee meeting.


The club at risk of missing out is Maidstone United, and the reason for it is the 3G artificial pitch that the club has fitted at The Gallagher Stadium, the new ground into which it moved in the summer of 2012. The game?s authorities, however, have not yet granted permission for 3G pitches to be used above Level Six ? the level at which Maidstone United currently play ? of the English National League System. As the rules stand today, the club would be refused promotion should it win the Ryman League title or the play-offs at the end of this season. Football Association rules preclude the use of artificial pitches in competitions featuring Premier League, Football League or Conference clubs and beyond the Fourth Qualifying Round of the FA Cup, although they are permitted below this level and in the FA Trophy and FA Vase, and it is this fudge of an arrangement that threatens to cause issues for Maidstone United at the end of this season."


Source: http://twohundredpercent.net/?p=25260

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From January this year and why 3g/4g is a no goer

> at present

>

> "It?s tight at the top of the Ryman League Premier

> Division. With a little less than half of the

> season left to play, just seven points seperate

> the top six clubs in the table and it remains, for

> now at least, anybody?s guess who from

> Kingstonian, Maidstone United, Wealdstone, Dulwich

> Hamlet, Bognor Regis Town or AFC Hornchurch will

> be taking a place in the Conference South. Indeed,

> one of these clubs will not even make the

> division?s play-offs come the end of the season.

> Out of that six, though, there is one club that

> will be furrowing the brows of people at the

> Football Association and the Football Conference

> more than their competitors at the moment, because

> at the moment one of those clubs could yet earn

> promotion on the pitch, only to be subsequently

> denied it at a committee meeting.

>

> The club at risk of missing out is Maidstone

> United, and the reason for it is the 3G artificial

> pitch that the club has fitted at The Gallagher

> Stadium, the new ground into which it moved in the

> summer of 2012. The game?s authorities, however,

> have not yet granted permission for 3G pitches to

> be used above Level Six ? the level at which

> Maidstone United currently play ? of the English

> National League System. As the rules stand today,

> the club would be refused promotion should it win

> the Ryman League title or the play-offs at the end

> of this season. Football Association rules

> preclude the use of artificial pitches in

> competitions featuring Premier League, Football

> League or Conference clubs and beyond the Fourth

> Qualifying Round of the FA Cup, although they are

> permitted below this level and in the FA Trophy

> and FA Vase, and it is this fudge of an

> arrangement that threatens to cause issues for

> Maidstone United at the end of this season."

>

> Source: http://twohundredpercent.net/?p=25260


This ruling has since been changed, and Maidstone will go up if they win promotion this season.

milk76 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But Gary, Southwark Council have already allocated

> the money and are going to upgrade the current

> astroturf pitch since it's current lease holders

> have allowed it to fall into disrepair.

>

> Hadley is not offering to add a facility it is

> trying to garner public support to remove one.

>

> Investing in a 4g pitch for the Champion Hill

> Stadium would increase conservatively eightfold

> the time the pitch could be used each week. Thus

> bringing in new, significant, year round revenue

> streams to the stadium. It would also greatly

> reduce upkeep costs and reduce the losses from wet

> weather cancellations. Sure it is not the profit

> they can make bulldozing it and then selling 200

> new homes, but I fail to see how it is in the

> public interest to change planning policy to help

> them make a pile of cash.


If the Council insists on simply upgrading the astroturf pitch, without allowing that pitch to be part of a new stadium, it could result in the death of the football club.


Yes, Hadley want public support for their plan to build on the current site of the stadium, but as part of their plan to do that they are also attempting to make provision for the football club. Putting the 4G pitch inside the current stadium is not an option, as Hadley want that land for their own uses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...