Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bognor are on same points, we above by GD BUT they have FIVE games in hand


Bognor won last night so Hamlet have dropped to fifth. Kingstonian could go above us too and put us out of the play off slots if they win their game in hand. The K's already missed a chance on Tuesday when they lost 4-0 at Enfield Town - which is where Dulwich play tomorrow (eeek).

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If they gop up there's no drinking outside. Long

> may the losing streak continue! ;-)


That would be a shame.. no drinking outside I mean. lol


Can't be many places where you get to see a game of football for ?10.00 ??? (?6.00 for me.. Though I would be happy to pay a tenner) and have a beer..


Foxy

Visitors for today's game have parked on both sides of Burrow/Abbotswood Roads, making it almost impossible to get through. Lucky our car is small - an emergency vehicle certainly would not have been able to pass through.

Not only totally inconsiderate (what's wrong with the car park?) But worrying considering the plans to extend the club and build 60 homes with only 30 parking spaces.

Also, if the game was at 3.00pm, why are people still shouting and blowing whistles at 9.0'clock?

pearl1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Visitors for today's game have parked on both

> sides of Burrow/Abbotswood Roads, making it almost

> impossible to get through. Lucky our car is small

> - an emergency vehicle certainly would not have

> been able to pass through.

> Not only totally inconsiderate (what's wrong with

> the car park?) But worrying considering the plans

> to extend the club and build 60 homes with only 30

> parking spaces.

> Also, if the game was at 3.00pm, why are people

> still shouting and blowing whistles at 9.0'clock?


posted at 20:55 :-)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's FA rules. Already in place for cup games, but

> the next league up would mean all games (except

> friendliues I guess).


This isn't true. Drinking is, fortunately, allowed in the Conference South. However it is banned from the Conference and upwards, so DHFC could have one promotion and still enjoy a beer on the terraces!

pearl1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But worrying considering the plans

> to extend the club and build 60 homes with only 30

> parking spaces.


Make that 155 residential dwellings. And the parking on the whole site will be increased by a mere 19 spaces (from the current 46 to 62). So you might want to take a look at the planning application and make your feelings known:

http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9565663

  • 2 weeks later...

There's the Swan in Needham Market itself:

https://m.facebook.com/The-Swan-Needham-Market-479665632201189/timeline?ref=page_internal

It's a Greene King pub and they're usually fine - there's a phone number on the link anyway if you want to check in advance.

Also the Rampant Horse in NM but it's not clear that does sport.

Otherwise there'll be more choice in Stowmarket just to the north or Ipswich to the south.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...