Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You can make yourself exempt by behaving in a way that would automatically want the courts to not have you on their premises as part of a jury. Worked for me, never heard from them since. Being self-employed it would have cost me a packet because I think I was warned it could be 3-4 weeks.

Have you received a Guide to Jury Summons, and a Reply to the Jury Summons form?


The former (available via https://www.gov.uk/jury-service ) says:

You have the right to be excused from the jury service if you have served as a juror, or attended to serve on a jury, during the two years preceding service of the juror summons. You may serve again if you wish, but you may exercise your right of excusal by completing Part 3 of the form ?Reply to the Jury Summons?. Please ensure you provide details of the court you attended, as we will check your service.

 

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You can make yourself exempt by behaving in a way

> > that would automatically want the courts to not

> > have you on their premises as part of a jury.

>

> Please tell us more :))


I suspect a BNP/EDL t-shirt would go a long way. But the downside would be that you'd be wearing a BNP/EDL t-shirt in public.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KidKruger Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > You can make yourself exempt by behaving in a

> way

> > > that would automatically want the courts to

> not

> > > have you on their premises as part of a jury.

>

> >

> > Please tell us more :))

>

> I suspect a BNP/EDL t-shirt would go a long way.

> But the downside would be that you'd be wearing a

> BNP/EDL t-shirt in public.



Oh God, that reminds me of when I wore my Hope Not Hate t-shirt out locally (acquired after I had been leafleting in Dagenham in 2010).


I thought I was getting strange looks, and it wasn't till I got home that I realised that although the t-shirt said on the front "Barking & Dagenham Council Elections 2010 Final Score Hope 51 BNP 0" my jacket had obscured most of the words apart from BNP :))


I've been wary of wearing it since then :))

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > KidKruger Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > You can make yourself exempt by behaving in

> a

> > way

> > > > that would automatically want the courts to

> > not

> > > > have you on their premises as part of a

> jury.

> >

> > >

> > > Please tell us more :))

> >

> > I suspect a BNP/EDL t-shirt would go a long way.

>

> > But the downside would be that you'd be wearing

> a

> > BNP/EDL t-shirt in public.

>

>

> Oh God, that reminds me of when I wore my Hope Not

> Hate t-shirt out locally (acquired after I had

> been leafleting in Dagenham in 2010).

>

> I thought I was getting strange looks, and it

> wasn't till I got home that I realised that

> although the t-shirt said on the front "Barking &

> Dagenham Council Elections 2010 Final Score Hope

> 51 BNP 0" my jacket had obscured most of the

> words apart from BNP :))

>

> I've been wary of wearing it since then :))


I went to an IT conference and met a guy who worked for BNP Paribas, the conference organiser just gave him a badge "BNP" and he was reduced to telling everyone he met that he was not an IT guru from the British National Party.

Never been called but would be happy to ?do my duty?.


My other half, on the other hand, is a magistrate and therefore, effectively, does jury duty voluntarily every week (albeit ?judge and jury duty? alongside two others) - for no financial reward or compensation whatsoever (beyond travel expenses).


Without magistrates the whole judicial system would grind to a halt. Virtually all criminal cases and most civil cases are first heard in a magistrates court. My understanding is that somewhere in the region of 95% of criminal cases are dealt with in their entirety at that level.

I was called to do jury service during the week my first baby was due. I asked to be excused from jury service on the grounds that I might go into labour in court. I was told that it wasn't a good enough reason not to do it. They reversed their decision when I said that I happy to do my duty as long as there was a midwife in the court!
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...