Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there


We're considering flying to Oz xmas this year and our baby will probably be only 6-8 weeks old. I'm worried that this is too ambitous for baby / me/ us. Don't know what state I'll be in to fly after the birth, and whether flying such a long way with the changes in time zones would affect the baby's routine (assuming there is one at that stage!). Would you recommend a overnight stopover on the way, or is it better to get it over and done with asap?


Any advice would be great

Thanks

I have to say that I was the most exhausted/ neurotic/emotional between weeks 2-8 (i.e after paternity leave finished and I was home alone) but when my husband was there I felt almost normal. If you have a supportive husband/partner then it should be do-able although you will be shattered - I think anyone would be even if they didn't have a child with them.


If you are going to fly long haul it is probably 'easier' with a young baby, as they just feed and sleep and need no entertaining to keep them (and consequently you and the rest of the plane) chirpy. I think very few babies have any sort of routine at that age and so it's probably the best time to travel across maultiple time zones with them as there is no no real disruption for them.


Having said all that, I have never flown with a baby but I am basing this advice on how my baby has changed from birth to 4 months in terms of demands for my attention/any sort of entertainment, sleep routine etc...Good luck!

I've flown to the Far East with a baby at 2 weeks. To be honest, it was dead easy, but then I wasn't the one who had been through the labour and delivery - my wife had flown a couple of days before with our other child, then three. That was an emergency trip, and we definitely wouldn't have planned to go until baby was 3 - 6 months.


The flight itself is unlikely to be v. difficult unless you are feeling terrible - baby won't care in all likelihood. Obviously you can't know now how you're going to feel, but if you are generally fit and are feeling well now there's no reason why you shouldn't be fine 6-8 weeks after the birth.


Ideally you want to get the trip over as quickly as possible, but make sure you get some sleep. If you normally sleep well on planes, do it in one hit. If you don't, I'd make an overnight stop. If it was me I'd fly to Singapore, spend a night in the transit hotel inside the airport, and fly on in the morning.


Transit hotel


Having said all that, I wouldn't do it unless you will be staying with family or close friends when you get there, who will pitch in and make sure that you can get plenty of rest in the first few days. And minimum 2 week stay.


Good luck.

I flew to Australia with a 10 week old and a 3 year old last year and it was fine - baby was too small to notice too much and we did it in one go, he slept a lot of the way in the crib thing. A night flight is much better than a day flight (from previous bitter experience) as it was 10pm by the time we got on the plane and he slept a lot of the first leg!

We have flown to NZ and Asia a couple of times with kids, though not as young as that.


From one point of view, 6-8 weeks is actually a great time to travel, especially if you are breastfeeding, as the baby will just nurse and sleep.


However, if you have had a c-section and are having a difficult recovery, you might find the long flight hard on you, never mind the baby! I think it depends in part what your own fitness is like before the birth. If you are generally fit beforehand, you should be pretty much back to normal physically by 6 weeks.


I wouldn't worry too much about baby's routine at 6-8 weeks, their routines are constantly changing throughout the first year due to teething, illnesses and growth spurts etc, so you kind of just have to take it as it comes.

We prefer to fly straight through without stopping over. It just adds so much time on, getting out of the airport, getting taxis/trains or whatever to your hotel, then finding something that your children will eat for the day you are there, then getting back to the airport again for another 3 hour check in, etc etc. About a 3 hour layover en route is best, IMO, if you can find it!


Good luck!

Claire

My advice would be if you are stopping over, get a hotel out of the airport. Singapore is incredibly easy to get around (just take yr carseat) and much nicer to stop somewhere that has a pool or at least you can see the sky... We stopped over in the transit hotel and my daughter didn't sleep which left us taking turns pushing her round the airport in a terrible loaner pram or bjorn. I actually think in some ways better just to push on through esp if you have family in Oz that would look after the baby while you have a nap.

I flew a 10 hour flight with a 7 week old (oh, and the week before sat on a plane for 6 hours with a 6 week old, which didn't fly...) at Christmas.


It was completely fine. He was too tiny to need entertaining, just slept or breastfed, and even when he cried he was so tiddy that no-one could really hear him. The staff at the airport and on the flight were incredibly nice to us, cooing over him and helping us out at every turn. On the way home, the night flight, he slept for quite a lot of it so we could too.


Our 3 year old was very good for his age, but he was much harder work than the baby!


One thing to be wary of though is that a holiday with a tiny baby is not a holiday in any real sense of the word - you'll want to be doing lots of things, seeing lots of people, socialising... and you'll hardly be sleeping. We had a lovely time, but it's good to be prepared to feel a bit knocked out. If you have kind family around to look after the baby while you have a snooze that will really help.

The baby will be fine, it's really how you are feeling that will make the difference.


We flew to NZ when our eldest was tiny and it was a breeze, basically feed, sleep, repeat for the 30 or so hours it takes to get from our house to my parent's house - certainly the easiest trip we've done. I felt fine within a couple of days of having my son so could easily have coped flying at 6 weeks, similarly after my 2nd baby.


If you have a c-section I'm not sure whether you are permitted to fly at 6 weeks, might be worth checking before you make any firm plans as you really can't tell what will happen.


Good luck!

The flight is fine. It's the torture of being woken at ridiculous hours for a week or so after you get there by small people with jet lag (when you are also knackered, as let's face it, it is a long flight and aeroplanes make you feel yuck). I find the family is great at letting you offload sprogs during the day, but there aint many offers to get up to 2am (do I sound bitter, do I???????????) And, unfortunately really little babies mainly need their mamma, so even during the day you may not get to escape/ rest as much as you may hope for (once again, do I sound bitter!!!????)


On the plus side a really small baby does sleep a lot so at least there is a good chance you can persuade them back to sleep promptly if they awaken in the night and during the flight.

  • 3 weeks later...
Oh no, I am flying to Orlando with my six month old baby at Christmas - baby is due in a couple of weeks - I hadn't really thought about the jetlag effect on the baby though. Think I will look for some tips! I have seen some videos on floridababy website that help with the flight advice

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...