Jump to content

G4 and the like to be given the right to arrest.....please sign if you don't agree


Recommended Posts

I don't trust G4S etc any more than I could throw them but maybe I'm old fashioned or something but I thought everybody (citizens and police) had the same right to arrest in the UK.


Edit: I wonder if the change here is "detention"

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't trust G4S etc any more than I could throw

> them but maybe I'm old fashioned or something but

> I thought everybody (citizens and police) had the

> same right to arrest in the UK.


The powers of citizen's arrest are actually quite limited - from memory a person has to be about to injure themselves or others, to cause loss of or damage to property or to be at risk of absconding before a police officer can attend having done one of those things. One can't, for example, carry out a citizen's arrest on someone who owes you child support, even though a court can order they be arrested for the offence. A civilian can't execute court arrest warrants unless specifically authorized by the court to do so - I think that's the main power the government want to give G4S. Which, given their track record, is a very, very silly idea.

Has anything ever changed one iota because of a 38 degrees petition? At least the Parliament petition site can force them to respond and/or debate the issue.


Mind you, the supposed 'reasoning' behind their name - "38 Degrees is the angle at which snowflakes come together to form an avalanche" - still gives me a good laugh.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't trust G4S etc any more than I could

> throw

> > them but maybe I'm old fashioned or something

> but

> > I thought everybody (citizens and police) had

> the

> > same right to arrest in the UK.

>

> The powers of citizen's arrest are actually quite

> limited - from memory a person has to be about to

> injure themselves or others, to cause loss of or

> damage to property or to be at risk of absconding

> before a police officer can attend having done one

> of those things. One can't, for example, carry

> out a citizen's arrest on someone who owes you

> child support, even though a court can order they

> be arrested for the offence. A civilian can't

> execute court arrest warrants unless specifically

> authorized by the court to do so - I think that's

> the main power the government want to give G4S.

> Which, given their track record, is a very, very

> silly idea.


OK - sounds about right - I'll sign as a quick google of G4S yields some bad stuff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just because the security did not chase the shoplifter does not mean no action was taken. Security camera footage can be sent to the police and used in evidence and actually is an effective means of prosecution.  Staff should not put themselves in a potentially dangerous position - stock is insured and can be replaced.  I remember a member of Coop staff chasing a thief and getting hurt     
    • Maybe I’ve got this wrong but didn’t the metropolitan police have a £200 minimum for investigating shoplifting  because of their other priorities.  
    • Absolutely don't post on the forum. By all means provide evidence to the police or shop security. 
    • Did you think about taking a photo on your phone and giving it to Co-op management ? Better still post here on the forum. If we see it an do nothing then the problem will only get worse and prices will hve to rise to cover the cost of this crime.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...