Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear all. Here is a heap of information regarding the police for you. I hope Admin may see fit to 'sticky' this.


Met Police Website's Site Map


Southwark Police website and phone numbers.


The Main Safer Neighbourhood team page from the Southwark Page, along with numbers and emails etc.


East Dulwich Safer neighbourhood page, with the map of the relevant area, and team members and numbers etc.


Peckham Rye Ward details with numbers and names and faces


And all the other individual teams can be found from the link three up.


Last night (19 May 2011) at the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel, Sgt Cooke told us about this police survey and hopes you will all fill it in. I have an idea some of you may already have done so as I have a feeling I put a link somewhere before.

But please all take a look and complete it if you have a few moments.


The Police Ward Panel last night (19 May 2011) was very interesting and quite well attended. I publicised it here as much as I could but considering the amount of reports of thefts and robberies on this forum, so few of you were there which is a shame. Would a different time help? We meet at 7. Would 8pm be a better start time? Discuss! Please also note that the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel does cover a lot of the East Dulwich environs, quite a way up Barry Road, The Gardens etc, as you can now all see on the maps on the above links. But if you are close to the edge of the border you are still welcome at ours.


Anyway, the survey.


Right, that's my homework and good deed for the day!

Please note, I did not write the posting 3 posts up, the one that has the 'or follow this link'.

That was not me: that must have been admin.

I don't quite see the point to be honest because the thread will drop and so no-one will see it.

Many people tell me they don't see the info tab, which is why I thought stickying THIS thread would be more useful for everyone.

So why can't it be stickied it if it is useful as the hits it has acquired seem to imply?

Straferjack isn't a moderator


Not sure what the problem is. I took a screenshot to illustrate how to get to the useful numbers page. By necessity this is at the top of a thread, which was started by peckhamrose. So the start of that post was part of the screenshot. Why the need to dissociate?

  • Administrator

Apologies John "The First Surrey Rifles - Vimy Ridge - 23 May 1916" did not appear to be related to East Dulwich, so I moved it to the Lounge.


Number of hits does not imply usefulness PeckhamRose, if it did then Community Veg Swap is more useful than this.

Loads of stuff is useful.


If this proves to be that useful it will automatically stay at the top of the page. If people really want it, they could even write down the information for themselves.


But STOP hectoring whenever something doesn't meet your approval.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
    • Dog kennel isn't a great name for a school. I agree that it's ridiculous for the name to put anyone off going there, but don't see any issue with them rebranding if the parents and children prefer a new name. The school is surrounded by historical 'groves' (reflected in the names of Camberwell Grove, Grove park and Grove Vale for example), so it's not a totally random name. 
    • It might help if there are body cams to record evidence and a presence maybe a deterrent but I very much doubt a park warden would intervene with obnoxious and violent thugs - children or not. We need police for that.  
    • I had a leaky toilet cistern and Niko came out the same day and not only fixed the leak but thoroughly cleaned off the years of calcium build-up. His attention to detail was matched by his kind humanity. The result was a completely renovated toilet which has never worked more efficiently as well as 'service with a smile'. MANY THANKS NIKO!!!  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...