Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear all. Here is a heap of information regarding the police for you. I hope Admin may see fit to 'sticky' this.


Met Police Website's Site Map


Southwark Police website and phone numbers.


The Main Safer Neighbourhood team page from the Southwark Page, along with numbers and emails etc.


East Dulwich Safer neighbourhood page, with the map of the relevant area, and team members and numbers etc.


Peckham Rye Ward details with numbers and names and faces


And all the other individual teams can be found from the link three up.


Last night (19 May 2011) at the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel, Sgt Cooke told us about this police survey and hopes you will all fill it in. I have an idea some of you may already have done so as I have a feeling I put a link somewhere before.

But please all take a look and complete it if you have a few moments.


The Police Ward Panel last night (19 May 2011) was very interesting and quite well attended. I publicised it here as much as I could but considering the amount of reports of thefts and robberies on this forum, so few of you were there which is a shame. Would a different time help? We meet at 7. Would 8pm be a better start time? Discuss! Please also note that the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel does cover a lot of the East Dulwich environs, quite a way up Barry Road, The Gardens etc, as you can now all see on the maps on the above links. But if you are close to the edge of the border you are still welcome at ours.


Anyway, the survey.


Right, that's my homework and good deed for the day!

Please note, I did not write the posting 3 posts up, the one that has the 'or follow this link'.

That was not me: that must have been admin.

I don't quite see the point to be honest because the thread will drop and so no-one will see it.

Many people tell me they don't see the info tab, which is why I thought stickying THIS thread would be more useful for everyone.

So why can't it be stickied it if it is useful as the hits it has acquired seem to imply?

Straferjack isn't a moderator


Not sure what the problem is. I took a screenshot to illustrate how to get to the useful numbers page. By necessity this is at the top of a thread, which was started by peckhamrose. So the start of that post was part of the screenshot. Why the need to dissociate?

  • Administrator

Apologies John "The First Surrey Rifles - Vimy Ridge - 23 May 1916" did not appear to be related to East Dulwich, so I moved it to the Lounge.


Number of hits does not imply usefulness PeckhamRose, if it did then Community Veg Swap is more useful than this.

Loads of stuff is useful.


If this proves to be that useful it will automatically stay at the top of the page. If people really want it, they could even write down the information for themselves.


But STOP hectoring whenever something doesn't meet your approval.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...