Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear all. Here is a heap of information regarding the police for you. I hope Admin may see fit to 'sticky' this.


Met Police Website's Site Map


Southwark Police website and phone numbers.


The Main Safer Neighbourhood team page from the Southwark Page, along with numbers and emails etc.


East Dulwich Safer neighbourhood page, with the map of the relevant area, and team members and numbers etc.


Peckham Rye Ward details with numbers and names and faces


And all the other individual teams can be found from the link three up.


Last night (19 May 2011) at the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel, Sgt Cooke told us about this police survey and hopes you will all fill it in. I have an idea some of you may already have done so as I have a feeling I put a link somewhere before.

But please all take a look and complete it if you have a few moments.


The Police Ward Panel last night (19 May 2011) was very interesting and quite well attended. I publicised it here as much as I could but considering the amount of reports of thefts and robberies on this forum, so few of you were there which is a shame. Would a different time help? We meet at 7. Would 8pm be a better start time? Discuss! Please also note that the Peckham Rye Police Ward Panel does cover a lot of the East Dulwich environs, quite a way up Barry Road, The Gardens etc, as you can now all see on the maps on the above links. But if you are close to the edge of the border you are still welcome at ours.


Anyway, the survey.


Right, that's my homework and good deed for the day!

Please note, I did not write the posting 3 posts up, the one that has the 'or follow this link'.

That was not me: that must have been admin.

I don't quite see the point to be honest because the thread will drop and so no-one will see it.

Many people tell me they don't see the info tab, which is why I thought stickying THIS thread would be more useful for everyone.

So why can't it be stickied it if it is useful as the hits it has acquired seem to imply?

Straferjack isn't a moderator


Not sure what the problem is. I took a screenshot to illustrate how to get to the useful numbers page. By necessity this is at the top of a thread, which was started by peckhamrose. So the start of that post was part of the screenshot. Why the need to dissociate?

  • Administrator

Apologies John "The First Surrey Rifles - Vimy Ridge - 23 May 1916" did not appear to be related to East Dulwich, so I moved it to the Lounge.


Number of hits does not imply usefulness PeckhamRose, if it did then Community Veg Swap is more useful than this.

Loads of stuff is useful.


If this proves to be that useful it will automatically stay at the top of the page. If people really want it, they could even write down the information for themselves.


But STOP hectoring whenever something doesn't meet your approval.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Europe, very much so, the whole of August is a write-off, if you want anything delivered from there, forget it, but there's no similar summer shutdown period in the UK as such, just people taking hols while kids off school etc. The nearest the UK construction sector has to a proper shut down is the Christmas/New Year period when, depending on when the Bank Holidays fall, there's an approx 10-14 day unofficial shutdown between Christmas and New Year... 
    • There's planning permission for 2 houses.  Southwark planning site is too slow today to use, but found this link from Savills to auction the site: https://auctions.savills.co.uk/auctions/19--26-november-2024-158/3335-hansler-road-east-dulwich-london-se22-9dj-13236   Edited to add that the inclusion of lower ground floor in the planning application description indicates that basements will be dug.  Looks like Fellbrigg/Hansler is up for some heavy construction traffic next year.
    • He looks like the human version of the 😡 emoji. I'm sure he's lovely in real life (whoever he is).
    • Absolutely, Insuflo I very much doubt that anyone other than football fans would have heard of Dyche, much less his views on false number nines, mobile centre halves  dropping into midfield or diamond formations. But all middle-aged, portly, bald, gruffly spoken football fans from north of the capital who eschew fancy Dan tactics for the traditional, English merits of 4-4-2 shall be deemed knuckle-dragging Neanderthals by the Wokerati and the Metropolitan Elite. They care not what his views are, only that he looks like the sort of person who may have them. It's political correctness gone mad. But they, unlike Dyche, won't have a pub named after them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...