Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmmm...


I always suspect there's a coded message from women who make sweeping comments about what men seek in the fairer sex as a justification of their lack of success ;-).


For example I reckon there's a tendency in overbearing controlling women to claim that there's nothing wrong with their own behaviour, it's just that men want vacant bimbos. Rather than recognise that in reality they're pushy and avaricious, these women instead claim to be an 'action woman' - and rather than recognise that they're mean and self-centered, instead they claim that men have a problem when they 'go running for mummy'.


All of my mates have very beautiful, proactive, generous and capable partners - so there's no evidence that these are qualities best avoided in women....

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm...

>

> I always suspect there's a coded message from

> women who make sweeping comments about what men

> seek in the fairer sex as a justification of their

> lack of success ;-).

>

> For example I reckon there's a tendency in

> overbearing controlling women to claim that

> there's nothing wrong with their own behaviour,

> it's just that men want vacant bimbos. Rather than

> recognise that in reality they're pushy and

> avaricious, these women instead claim to be an

> 'action woman' - and rather than recognise that

> they're mean and self-centered, instead they claim

> that men have a problem when they 'go running for

> mummy'.

>

> All of my mates have very beautiful, proactive,

> generous and capable partners - so there's no

> evidence that these are qualities best avoided in

> women....



Then there could be overbearing, selfish, action women with a bevvy of admirers and the energy to enjoy many of them.

Actually and observationlly, most of the properly intelligent men I know seem to be partnered with equally intelligent women so some sexist horrendous crappy steretypes going on here....from the ladies. Most of the men I know with 'bits of trinket fluff' (mmmmm) are themselves of the dense variety.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Possibly, but these men would be being 'used' I

> suspect... not really an admirable trait in

> itself.



It takes all sorts Hugo. There are plenty of men who like it that way :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ah that was it.... When you realise politicians are only ever in it for themselves then everything starts to make sense.  
    • Yup. Student politics. https://bright-green.org/2012/04/09/democracy-and-direct-action-an-interview-with-edinburgh-universitys-new-student-president-james-mcash/
    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...