Jump to content

Please don't bump posts


Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Time for a friendly reminder not to bump posts please. This is a fast moving board, and it's not fair for posts to be pushed down by people bumping up their posts daily (i.e., "still available" the day after first posting it). I have had to hide about 20 posts so far today from people doing exactly this, and to be honest I have better things to do!


Repeat offenders will receive an email from me. Continuing to break the rules will result in a ban.


Thank you for your understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
  • 2 years later...

renarde Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> please tell me how i get a red "new"mention when i

> do a fresh posting. Thank you!!!!

>

> annie


This function is an automatic one, however you will never see "new" beside your own posts, only those of other people. Yours will show as new to other users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Yes it would be really useful to know when it?s acceptable to bump a post by adding a STILL AVAILABLE. 2 weeks?


Thanks


Loucpearls Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it okay to bump if post has been up for more

> than two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme at the time…until they lost), suggests they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows strong majority support across London.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...