Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Doorbell just rang at 3am - took me a little while to get downstairs, when I got there there were three sets of people on scooters / motorbikes parked across the road, they yelled something at me, appeared to be consulting a map or piece of paper, and then rode off. There had been a loud knock at the door at around 9:15 or 9:30 last night that I didn?t answer. It?s a potential burglary, no? Am now a bit anxious. Tried ringing 101 to report suspicious activity but gave up after being on hold for over 15 minutes with message that there was a lengthy wait time. Should I ring a police station or fill in the online form (bit pointless as nothing very concrete to tell them)? Feel like I should tell someone.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175469-thwarted-burglary-3am-doorbell/
Share on other sites

Yes do tell the police - if nothing else it'll help them build up a picture of potential areas to watch - and next time (hopefully there won't be a next time) something like this happens, call 999. Police advice is to use 999 "when someone suspected of a crime is nearby" - I think three lots of scooterists ringing your bell at 3AM certainly makes them suspicious. The police will take you seriously and anyway, the worst that can happen is that the operator will transfer you to 101. Hope you're not too shaken.

It's becoming worryingly difficult to get support from the police in non-emergency situations. In the last few weeks I filed a crime report online (no response apart from the automated one), called 101 (permahold + 'we're busy dealing with emergencies' message - why, when I called the non-emergency number?) and called the local Safer Neighbourhood Team ('no one available right now', left a message, no response).


Sad lack of funding means petty criminals have been given tacit permission to do as they like, with no fear of consequences, and we're now on our own.

If it's non urgent I'll just report it online and not expect a response - if it's certain crimes you do need a crime number and that's all the police expect you want.


I don't expect an individual investigation but if a higher level team is investigating I'd expect it to be added to their list (as it were).

legalalien Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rang 101 this morning and reported - much shorter

> wait time so I guess there are more operators on

> at 7am than at 3am!



Or also probably less potential crime at 7am than 3am?


Hope you aren't too shaken, it sounds very scary.

In general I would avoid answering the door in the early hours, unless you have good reason to suppose that someone legitimate might be calling. If you don't have a door viewer it is worth getting one installed so that you can see who's there (and a chain so you don't have to open a door fully, if you have to open it at all). A collection of moped riders outside your house at 3:00am and ringing your door would warrant a 999 call in my view. This was, at least potentially, an active incident.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps some link with the travellers who were

> camped close by last week?



Perhaps some link with many possible people.


Why single out travellers who evidently aren't even there any more?

Because it's very recent and they were responsible for a number of crimes while they were there: breaking and entering, trespass, damage to property, dumping of industrial waste and theft being the main ones, as far as I'm aware.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because it's very recent and they were responsible

> for a number of crimes while they were there:

> breaking and entering, trespass, damage to

> property, dumping of industrial waste and theft

> being the main ones, as far as I'm aware.



But that was all related to the place where they were staying, wasn't it?


There was no evidence that they committed any crimes anywhere else, was there?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...