Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Darling SimonM,


OHMYGOD NO!


How could anyone ever say such a dreadful thing about the lovely Mr Nesbit?


How very and completely out of character for him!!! I refuse to believe it. He is a married man with children afterall. No, no, no. It simply cannot be true.


Could you post a link?

I have indeed subscribed as you so kindly suggested, and they sent me lots of juicy gossip - but nothing about the sweet family man you mention above!


I am sticking my fingers in my ears and singing out loud, I am sure he is a lovely family man and this article you mention is simply a mis-print...

"James Nesbitt at the NZ v France match, aisle 431,

row M, seat 11, wearing a pale blue beret, supporting

France, telling the women around him he was an actor"


Maybe the women around him just asked what he did for a living after they had gotten to know each other?


Apart from that detail there doesn't sound much wrong with this "tidbit" anyway - gregarious Irish man with an eye for ladies.. sounds ok to me

  • 3 weeks later...

fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Anyone notice the front page of "Living South"

> > photographed by our own talented forumite?

>

>

> What a handsome chap he is, too.


ithankyew... ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He played the system.  He deprived the government of money that could be spent on the country.  Whether wisely or wasted.  It (Farage) makes me sick.  How could anyone who believes in society and contributing according to their means not agree?  
    • If you are referring to his comments about  Angela Rayner's dishonest declarations resulting in evasion of tax on her purchase of the flat in hove, then there is no hypocrisy on Farage's part.  He funded the purchase of a property in his partner's name. This is 100% legitimate and makes good sense in terms of reducing IHT liability in the future - given their respective ages and individual wealth. Rayner's action was "evasion" which is illegal. Farage's action was "avoidance" which is 100% legitimate.  
    • Does anyone know or can recommend anyone to replace the cylinder on an office chair please.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...