Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are you thinking carrycot type pram (baby might be a bit big? Mostly up to 6m) or lie flat buggy? For lie flat buggy the baby jogger city mini is fab for hols as completely flat with great sunhood. As buggie says you could put one of the big cover up sunshades on. Or the maclaren triumph lies completely flat too....


More info please! But I'm not v good at ebay prams....(too addicted to shiny-ness of new...husband not happy about this...))

We had the City Mini as well and it was fabulous for buggy sleeps. My son managed to fall sleep in it until he was around three yrs old (long days out type of thing). It has loads of space to stretch out and a really great sun shade the almost covers the whole child. Actually we really really loved that buggy, one hand fold and fit in a small hatchback boot. And they are quite inexpensive.

That is expensive! However, other websites/companies are selling it for ?40-50 - I've no idea how that compares to other buggy boards but the relatively low price of the pram may make up for this.


I agree that the brake looks like it may be blocked by the board but having read some reviews no-one seem to complains of difficulty accessing the brake once the board is on...

Hmm- maclaren with sheepskin liner and cool sheet/muslin over the top for bed softness but no overheating?


I'm useless with this nap caper, Cheeky S still co-naps in my bed with me every single day and he's almost 18mo. Only sleeps in a cot at g-mas or in the pram occasionally. I'm sure this will work BRILLIANTLY when Baby 2 arrives.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...