Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


Im hoping some experienced mums and dads can break it down for me in simple terms the cost of a nanny either 1:1 or a share situation please.


We always thought we would do a nanny and with baby number 1 on the way we have been doing some research but it seems quite hard to find a figure of what it will cost once you have paid their tax etc etc.. We assumed that the person would be working for themselves so we wouldnt need to pay tax or holiday (that this would just be swept up in the hourly rate) but it seems we do so we are moving away from this option as it sounds a little complicated (hence why Im asking). I got a price from a local nursery which was ?925 pm for 4 days a week.. Does anyone know how the prices for a nanny stack up against this? The nursery we are looking at is the mother goose glendale or also the gumboots one in crystal palace road but am waiting on costs from them..


thanks so much


Jules x

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17701-nanny-vs-nursery-costs/
Share on other sites

there are lots of nanny pay calculators if you do a google. I see a 10 hour 4 day week at ?10 net per hour coming to ?574/week once you account for tax. So clearly a lot more than nursery. You also have to account for any extra costs - for activities, petrol, nanny's car insurance, heating your house all day in winter, etc.


A popular option is to share the nanny with another child of the same age. We do this and my per day cost is around ?70. Still not cheap but just a bit more than the pricier nurseries. You can also find cheaper nannies starting out charging more like ?7-8 net per hour - that would bring it down to about ?373 for a four day week.


It's a very personal decision but I felt more comfortable leaving my then-one year old with our wonderful nanny who comes to our house and gives him tons of attention, rather than putting him in nursery which I feel can be somewhat stressful and chaotic for tiny children. i have friends whose little ones apparently thrived in nursery from as early as 6 months though so like I said it's a personal thing.

cm = kids go to their house, and it's not one on one - but there are quotas so won't be millions of kids, there are rules re ratio/ages (e.g. only so many under 2 etc). It's a good option in my opinion as you get potentially more one to one/intimate care than a nursery setting. Of course not having the care in your own home has its pros/cons (works for me as some of the little work I do is from home so good to have him out of the house!). It's significantly cheaper than a nanny and can be cheaper than nursery too, and with more flexibility in some cases. However it's just one person so you need to know you click with them, are happy leaving child with them etc. Word of mouth recommendation prob best.


oh other upside is you are not their employer (unlike nanny) so you don't have the financial/time responsibility of their benefits, sick leave etc.

yes childminder can be a good cost effective option but good luck finding one you like, that is convenient, and has a slot for you! we used one briefly before moving to ED from Kennington. I liked her a lot but there were some issues around extra children seeming to turn up all the time, though I'm sure most people don't breach the rules. Must have been to see/talked to about 15 before finding her. And then when we moved to ED it seemed mission impossible to find anyone. Obviously it does happen though!

CM cost can be anything from ?35-70/day. Some charge per hour. and i think you usually still pay during your own holidays, though not always during theirs. (as opposed to nanny you pay 52 weeks/year).

Yes good childminders are like gold dust! I've had 2 amazing ones, found on this forum. It was difficult to find someone to work on Fridays I seem to remeber and I work Weds-Fri. We pay ?50 (8-6 although I collect at 5) per day which I think is average (?). I think it's a really good option as during the day there will probably be only 1 or 2 other children there so it's like a little family, more after school usually. I suppose one of the downsides would be if CM is ill you need to take a day off work unless you've got some sort of back up but I can honestly say that has never happened to us. It's finding the right person in the right location that's tricky. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...