Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"after being educated about my sexual needs and how to satisfy them"


Ha ha :)


Do you think if I suggested that the failing in women was that they were refusing to be educated about my sexual needs and how to satisfy them, it might be suuggested that I was oppressing females? ;-)


"We in the 'civilised' West practice a form of mental clitoridectomy on women"


I think in 'Happy Days' that would be decribed as 'jumping the shark'.


Clearly you have a sizeable, demanding and commanding sexual appetite LadyDelilah (on which I cast no judgement) - but please be assured that if others don't share it, it's not because of either inadequancy or persecution.

Huguenot, clearly not everyone is as accomodating or non-judgemental as you are!


This is not really about my sexual appetite though, (which is on the wane with age as it happens!), it's about my right to have one.


There is no judgement made by me or anyone else I can see, of anyone who lacks a sexual appetite or is happy with perfunctory sex.


I think Slutwalk, or at least the contributions on here to the debate, have been about not condemning women who do enjoy sex and who want to be treated as an equal participant.

Well it might Mockney, if any fucker actually bothered to look at pictures of the fucking thing.


MOST PEOPLE WERE WEARING JEANS AND T SHIRTS.


Christ on a bike, how many times do I have to say that I was there and saw what people were wearing and it's not what Victoria Coren (who can frankly shove it up her, I'm-a-woman-me-and-I-play-poker-and-it's-just-so-liberating-and-men-find-it-sexy arse) thinks, so and her fucking stupid assumption that the Slutwalk was a load of riot grrls in their bras and pants was fucking stupid. And what's that, "fitted dress" you say Victoria, you great big slut you.


So Piers, lovely Piers, reader of history and fact and normally quite sensible Piers. GET YOUR FUCKING FACTS STRAIGHT.


ahem.

Arf! I love it when you're angry RosieH. Having just read this paragraph I'm sure you'd really like to punch her in the face. Stupid, vacuous cow that she is for writing such fatuous nonsense especially the last sentence.




"Mostly, I am sad that feminism is suddenly all about clothing. Maybe that's the answer to what I find rum, what makes me suspicious: it feels like just another way to chat about fashion. The only piece of clothing which is relevant for modern feminists to debate ? the only one with a complex argument, counter-argument and serious social implications either way ? is the burqa. Shorts, bras, bunny ears? Meh, leave that to Sex and the City. None of it matters. None of it means anything."

I think she may have stopped short of standing by her own argument by a bit of reductio ad absurdum in an attempt to let herself off the hook.

Thus giving food for detractors without the need to address the salient points.


A pattern of behaviour exploited by many of the loons on our own fair forum come to think of it.

Parking the rights and wrongs aside - the media can't really be criticised for publishing photos of the girls at the front in their bras etc at a self named Slutwalk, but maybe that wasn't your point Rosie? just an observation. Anyway, it's got far more debate globally than if it had been "Women against violence walk" or something similar has worked in that sense and I think that's good.



PS Victoria Coren's poker column is ther only readable thing in the Guardian ;-) She is a very decent poker player too

Yeah Quids, I don't blame the media really - they lived down to my expectations - even where I'd expect better like in the Guardian.


The whole debate's pretty fractured, even within the feminist community. (Although I wouldn't include Victoria, however sharp her cardery). To reclaim or not reclaim the word "slut", to dress deliberately provocatively or not (and by that I don't meean sexually, just literally to provoke a reaction), and something I hadn't heard before the walk itself, only since, but does the walk somehow commodify feminism by packaging it up in a nice pretty brand like a burlesque tea party.


However for me, the Feminist Library summed it up nicely as "an energetic wave of feminist activism against rape, victim-blaming and police sexism". That makes me happy when I see so many interviews with D list celebs who litter the pages of our most popular magazines as role models for the intellectually stunted and morally bankrupt, and shun "feminism" as not for them.

Did you do the second one yourself? ;-)


http://c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000FM2Gf7qVdeo/s/750/600/110611-London-Slutwalk-010.jpg


Julie Bindel is making a speech to celebrate World Femininity Day.


I'd barely got a paragraph into it before she asserted that men invented the word 'slut'.


Now whilst I accept that many people think I am blind to the great injustices imposed upon women by men, I feel it's only right to highlight that I have very rarely heard a man disparagingly brand a woman a 'slut', and when they do it seems to spark global protest.


Conversely women seem to use it persistently and aggressively to establish internecine pecking orders.


So I could be forgiven for believing that men didn't invent the word slut at all - that in fact women did it to undermine sexual competition. In that context I can't even be bothered to read the rest of the speech if it's just going to be a volley of unsubstantiated allegations and 'blood libels'.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Julie Bindel is a mysoginist who hates women who

> love hetrosexual sex and she needs to be gagged,

> or ignored.

>

> It's her hot voice. Can she not do what she wants

> with it?



Lol, I guess so!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'd barely got a paragraph into it before she

> asserted that men invented the word 'slut'.


Well to be pedantic, she doesn't say men invented the word. Dearest Huguenot, you do this on every single feminist argument and one of these days I'm going to come over there and slap you round the chops with a bloody tampon.


Don't get so caught up in a sense of your own indignance that you refuse to enagage sensibly with the argument, it's beneath you and a little toddler / toys / prams. She said a mean thing about some boys and I'm a boy so therefore she's calling me Jack the Ripper.


The madonna / whore dichotomy is fairly widely accepted. Women come up against it regularly. I know I have, and I know it wasn't from women establishing a pecking order, it was men employing double standards. So stop being an idiot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you want to change a radiator and it is the same size, pretty straight forward.  isolate by turning the two valves, one is straight forward hand twist, the other side you need to take the cap off and get an adjustable spanner and turn till closed.  Both clockwise. Use the same spanner to undo the large nuts that fix the radiator to the pipework, open the bleed valve, get a flatish container to catch the water which is likely to be a grotty black, sheets/plastic underneath to protect floor/floor covering.  Then jiggle off, tipping as quick as you an into your water container. Fingers crossed it will be the same back plate fitting.  If not you will have to take the old one off and fix the new one. Replacement is a reverse, allowing the rad to refill and let the air out. No naked flames involved. If it is a different size I can advise on that too. Lots on line too: https://www.toolstation.com/help-and-advice/how-to-guides/how-to-remove-radiator?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=19747119835&gclid=CjwKCAiAkvDMBhBMEiwAnUA9BR26YwBA6kOfcR4-JVxfJEjWdhRk6j0imCNcsIfu064wHN54-cs10xoCZ4cQAvD_BwE Although this is for a pressurised (combi) system where you need to get it back to pressure.  Pretty simple.  I don't bother with jointing compound.    
    • Fair enough - I'm absolutely wrong on that one. 👍
    • I'm still completely unclear what happened, apart from that a car apparently crashed into a lamp post opposite the Co-op. I presume the one in Lordship Lane, though the OP doesn't say. Was it speeding? Did it swerve to avoid someone who ran into the road? Did something go wrong with its brakes or steering? Did the driver have a medical emergency or fall asleep or got  distracted by something? Was there something slippery on the road surface? Was the driver hurt? Were any passengers hurt? Were any pedestrians or other road users hurt? Were there any witnesses? 
    • confused by the question?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...