Jump to content

Pictures


Ridgley

Recommended Posts

Yes, you click on the photo attachment and copy the URL shown and then edit your post by using 'Insert image URL' button (the one with the mountains and the sun), pasting in the URL you copied.


Does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you mean a picture from the web you follow moo's instructions above but make sure the address you put in is the full address to the picture itself.


If it's a file on your computer you first attach as a file then when that is posted, right click and copy the URL/address and go back to moo's instructions again



Boom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I blame predictive textery? No matter, you are

> quite correct. Anyone reading that post, please

> move the ' one character to the right. Thank you

>

> ????. I'll speak to you later


One should actually have written 'Moos's instructions'. As in Bridget Jones's Diary....a handy populist reference to keep you on track there Mr Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not great success not sure where I am going wrong

> I have followed your instructions Moo but keeps

> coming out as an attachments not as a photo?



I had as little trouble with this at first too - the easiest way is to right click the image you want, select 'view image info' and a box will appear headed 'page info' with many lines of URLs including the one relating to your image which should be highlighted. Simply copy this then return to your post, select the 'insert image URL' button, delete the http:// it starts with and paste in the line you copied from the 'page info' window. Voila!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although be aware that by doing this (described by maxxi) anyone who clicks into the thread will be using the bandwidth of the person who is hosting the image. Can be a problem if it's a personal website or personally hosted image. Used to be considered very poor "netiquette" to do this, esp if the end result is that you massively increase the host's bandwidth. Not sure if it is considered the same now?


All other forums I regularly participate have a clear ban on hotlinking, you must host the image yourself. {Edited to say they're all techie forums and probably have had that rule in place for ages, so may not be relevant to something like the EDF}


http://altlab.com/hotlinking.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On my own pics (rather than those I find on line) I use MS Office Picture Manager (r click image and select edit option, 'resize' then tick 'predefined width and height' box and choose 'web large' in drop-down menu. This changes a typical pic from say 2.8MB to 125KB.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Under the video on youtube, there will be an option to "share". Click that, and further options will appear, one of which is "embed". Click that, and some code will appear l. Copy the code, and paste it un to your post on here, and hey presto, the video should appear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

this is the best way ive found:



Here goes.....


1 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/1.png


2 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/2-1.png


3 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/4.png


5 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/5.png


6 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/6.png


7 For this step click on the box where it says IGM Code, this should copy it


8 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/8.png


9 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/9.png


10 http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z342/tommybc1/10.png


cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...