Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm saying that the OP deserves to be treated with a bit of respect. I'm getting really bored of the abusive way some people behave on this forum just because they can hide behind a user name and don't have to see the effect of what they say on other people. If you don't want to join in then don't - there are a lot of threads I don't bother with.

And?


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ms B

>

> come now, attime of writing in the Lounge I can

> see...

>

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=28103

>

> I think jester has had a good run for the money on

> the original "game" no?

To have a barely different thread title for a new game begs a little ribbing I would have thought?


It's not that out of order or disrespectful? Certainly not on a forum


But I wholeheartedly endorse RosieH's idea for some kind of playpen section where games like this can exist without intrusion from the likes of big bad *bob* and myself

With respect *coughs* he's a bit of a one trick pony


Admittedly he did post on the betting thread 71 72 posts ago BUT even he'd appreciated the amount of traffic his "latest" thread has created.


If not he can fuck right off


Now, where were we...


Does *kunt count ?



N(?)



*Origin: German

A sheath or skabbard in which to hold or contain a coachman's horse whip when not in use.

Can't see the harm in it, either.


Of course I'm too busy, witty, well-endowed and hungover to take part, but can't see the need to poke fun at them that does.


(Do I have to hand my clique badge in, already? I'm only two weeks away from making my pension. Got my eye on a nice little place in the country. Gonna grow me some lemons. Make lemonade. See the grandkids.)

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice going, Mockney and *Bob*; you've just chased

> off another forum user. Final post from me for the

> foreseeable future.



It's really all *Bob*s fault


The rest just followed him, but he DEFINITELY started it


Thanks for not singling me out, I would have felt dreadful



Your hair looks nice today BTW ( even though I can't actually see it )



Nette:-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...