Jump to content

Is the Picture House Open today?


SR

Recommended Posts

Thanks Penguin, I support the strikers they should have the london minimum wage. I'd pay a wee bit more for that. Today i have 2 kids that are expecting to see Coco and I dont fancy letting them down so will go, not sure if the strikers want people to not attend.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe take them to peckhamex. That way you?ll be

> supporting the strikers and an independent cinema

> at the same time. independent.


I entirely support the PH workers' campaign, but does anyone know what they're paid at Peckhamplex? I have actually emailed them to ask if they pay the LLW but no response.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well they stay open and make a profit at ?4.99 a

> seat. At 3 x that Picture house can afford the LLW


As I said, I entirely support PH staff's campaign for LLW. But still very interested to know if Peckhamplex (which I use regularly) manages to offer such cheap tickets by not paying LLW.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well they stay open and make a profit at ?4.99 a

> seat. At 3 x that Picture house can afford the LLW


Beside the point, surely.


Do Plex pay LLW or not? Is going there really any better? Surely this is important info if you're really that concerned.

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...