Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

If one agrees to the premice that people who live in colder harsher climate will have a greater propensity for work, steming from the neccessity to insulate ourselves from the weather. Then maybe it is lost cause to think that countries like Spain, Greece, the regions of southern Italy will ever contribute meanigfuly enough to keep the Euro strong.


Perhaps there is a clever solution to harmonise to completely different economical dynamics.


Any ideas?

There was I thinking that Greece may have remained a primarily poor agrarian economy, neglected under torpid Ottoman rule, was plunged into bitter civil war within decades of independence and suffered many years of military mismanagement, before finally entering the European Union and understandable splashing the cash offered as the country escaped poverty for the first time but only had limited time to modernise and diversify its economy before global financial crisis hit.


Stupid me, it's because it's hot there, well for at least 5 or 6 months of the year.

There was I thinking that Spain may have remained a primarily poor agrarian economy, devastated by the napoleonic wars and torn apart by a century of political instability and strife which witnessed almost total loss of its empire, was plunged into bitter civil war and suffered many years of military mismanagement, before finally entering the European Union and understandable splashing the cash offered as the country escaped poverty for the first time but only had limited time to modernise and diversify its economy before global financial crisis hit.


Stupid me, it's because it's hot there, well for at least 4 to 5 months of the year.

I can do Portugal too if you like. Italy at a pinch, though as its economy is never that far from that of the UK despite its rubbish politics, it probably doesn't need me to do so. Nice of you to cherry pick Southern Italy though.

Isn't that a bit like saying rain makes people want to mine underground or stay at home unemployed, just look at wales?

Weber's theory of cultural determinism = Protestantism and capitalism are inextricably linked with the qualities of the former, in particular individualism and (ironically) the rejection of materialism, being the driving force for the development of the latter. Hence Calvinist Germany and Switzerland more economically successful than Catholic Spain and Italy.


Of course, that may also be complete tosh.

Weber was rather begging the question though, as is paphio.


"Given that Northern protestant states are more successful, it is the northerness and protestantness of states that makes them successful"


That's the problem with using historical determinism. Had he tried that a hundred odd years before hand he'd have wondered why it is that northern protestant states are unable to find any political unity, and would probably have determined that it's their very northerness and protestantness.


In other words, yes, tosh.

And where does Ireland fit into all this with its crappy weather?

Oh hang on, is it catholicism, yeah that's it, it's catholicism.....and err....greek orthodoxy.....

Oh hang on, Austria's catholic too, but it's cold, well actually it's really pretty hot in the summer apart from the really tall bits. Hmm maybe there's a germanic exception to the rule. Croatia, hot check, catholic check, but that's a pretty rich place, especially considering it was communist for so long...


Rule of thumb, if the exceptions and provisos to your rule start mounting up, then your hypothesis is probably a bit pants.

What I am in broad strokes referring to is Montesquieu theory of geocultural determinism where I think the term -insular- was also created as a qualitative adjective to folk living in the British Ilses.


Montesquieu lived during the 18th century...a bit before Weber by a couple of centuries


Not wanting to be to inflammatory but still wanting to add to this hypothesis, I think it is also relevant to add that a hot climate tend to slow the pace of life as it unfolds daily... that is until me air-con the whole world.


The argument goes against rational economical theories which want fit its principles in one neat conceptual bag.


Out there, ... but hey, adds fuel to the topic.

"The argument goes against rational economical theories which want[s to] fit its principles in one neat conceptual bag"


I'd say a) scratch economical from above, and

b)so the rational theory is trying to fit everything into a neat bag, thereby implicitly "because it's hot" isn't?

There are, naturally, a whole bunch of other theories. One is that it is not Protestantism per se that makes the difference, but that Protestantism is associated with significantly higher levels of literacy (because of the need to read the bible, which was prohibited to Catholics). F Fukuyama reckons it's all about trust, but he didn't turn out to be so hot on the end of history, so who knows.


Back on topic, I think a little bit of I told you so-ing might be forgivable from those who pointed out the difficulties of having a single currency without sensible and consistent fiscal policies across the Eurozone.

I think it would be remiss of any academic not to include religion as a factor, and the literacy argument is at least a little persuasive.


My problem is that any theory when dealing with anything as complex as society, culture, economics, socio-economics, politics, climate, industry, international trade, war, strife and an interaction of all of the above, tends by its very nature to be reductionist, and then by definition simplistic.


Fukuyama is far from stupid, which shows just how tempting historical determinism (history led to this moment) is. It's the same thing that drives people to constantly fall for 'the end of the world is nigh'. People like to think that their own time is somehow more significant than time gone before it.


Agreed that 'i told you so', even a leeeeetle bit of schadenfreude is understandable among those so inclined. It's the obvious glee (especially given the suffering and woes caused) that some have seen fit to do it with that many of the posters on here find so distasteful.

So the fact that all Southern countries of the E U defaulting, and none of the Northen ones, with the exception of Ireland,has nothing to do with climate?

I understand the climate theory is reductionist but I believe it plays a fairly important part in the whole economical equation...less productivity due to fewer working hours is perhaps one of the obvious variable.

"My problem is that any theory when dealing with anything as complex as society, culture, economics, socio-economics, politics, climate, industry, international trade, war, strife and an interaction of all of the above, tends by its very nature to be reductionist, and then by definition simplistic"


Theories always represent a simplification of real life - drawing a neat curve through a messy pattern of dots. The issue, surely, is whether there is a pattern to the dots at all, or whether the curve is just wishful thinking. I'm fairly sure that climate has close to zero causative link with economic prosperity, but that doesn't mean there's nothing that Ireland, Greece and Spain have in commmon (but Germany doesn't).

Why try to look for commonality in something so complex, can't it be that any theory on something as hugely chaotic unpredictable and emotional as human interaction is pointless and that each case has it's own set of reasons, some common most not, that leads, in each case, to similar consequences.


I used to work in risk systems in investment banking. The idea that empirical analysis could be applied to unpredictable systems and quantify the levels of risk faced. It turned out to be complete bollocks, but even worse gave the bankers the very confidence to take greater risks because a bunch of numbers said they were within limits,


I'm just not sure what purpose this weather theory serves, especially given that it's total bollocks.


How do high performing Asian economies fit in, what about Brazilian growth, Indian? What about California for that matter?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...