Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would dream of getting premiums that low round here.


Insurers see my postcode as being a high subsidence risk, plenty won't quote and and the last specialist I tried wanted to put a 40k excess on subsidence claims (despite having seen the survey which says movement is historic), so I am stuck paying nearly ?1k. My house isn't large either - 3 bed half house, but the third is a loft conversion - i.e. the ground floor size is that of a two bed. No exciting contents either.

Tomskip - it all depends on what your covering e.g. term value of your contents, type of building etc. crime rates in your postcode....a whole host of factors go into calculating the premium.


I agree with Calsug - ?450 is cheap and so I'd be worried you have enough cover. To most consumers, all home and content insurance is a commodity and is the same...but it's not. There can be huge differences in cover that you only find out about when you need it. Good insurers such as Hiscox charge more but you get a very comprehensive cover and excellent claims service in return. Things to check are:


- Jewellery/valuables cover

- Laptop / gadget cover

- Cash cover including outside of the house

- Subsidence cover - especially in SE22. Many insurers will quote higher for this but you can often get them down by providing an independent survey / report which costs money but can save you ?100's over the longer term.

- Rebuild cost - check your buildings covers a total loss scenario and that the buildings value is enough to cover cost of rebuilding.



By comparison we pay about ?700 pa for combined home and contents in a 4 bed house in SE22.

Ours is ?230 for a 4-bed family terraced house, insured with Sainsburys Bank. Covers subsidence, rebuild cost, personal possessions including cycles and laptop outside the home etc. Single article limit of ?2k (I don't have expensive jewellery or anything like that so I can't think of anything in the house that costs more than that). I know all this as it was just up for renewal so the letter is sitting right here on my desk!


Our house insurance used to cost a lot more as we did that thing of just staying with the same company and accepting that our premium crept up and up each year. Then a few years ago I gripped it and shopped around and saved about ?350/yr by swapping policies. So far Sainsburys have been good to deal with, though (touching wood frantically) I've not had to claim yet.


Definitely worth shopping around though as the previous poster says, you do have to compare like-for-like. I also saved a fortune by gripping my gas/electricity supply and swapping from NPower to a company I'd never heard of (Flow), which has been absolutely fine and again well worth doing.


God, though, it's boring being a grown-up, isn't it?

Thanks for replying.


Well, I went on the Direct Line website and plugged in our data. There were no questions about level of cover or any details about type of contents (ours are all drearily average anyway) just address and type of house etc. Took less than 5 minutes. Computer said ?275! So we went back to our usual company, the ones who'd sent the renewal quote of ?450, and after about 10 minutes of umming and ahhing and "seeing what they could do" they gave us ?150 off.


So, buns for tea!

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ours is ?230 for a 4-bed family terraced house,

> insured with Sainsburys Bank. Covers subsidence,

> rebuild cost, personal possessions including

> cycles and laptop outside the home etc. Single

> article limit of ?2k (I don't have expensive

> jewellery or anything like that so I can't think

> of anything in the house that costs more than

> that). I know all this as it was just up for

> renewal so the letter is sitting right here on my

> desk!

>

> Our house insurance used to cost a lot more as we

> did that thing of just staying with the same

> company and accepting that our premium crept up

> and up each year. Then a few years ago I gripped

> it and shopped around and saved about ?350/yr by

> swapping policies. So far Sainsburys have been

> good to deal with, though (touching wood

> frantically) I've not had to claim yet.

>

> Definitely worth shopping around though as the

> previous poster says, you do have to compare

> like-for-like. I also saved a fortune by gripping

> my gas/electricity supply and swapping from NPower

> to a company I'd never heard of (Flow), which has

> been absolutely fine and again well worth doing.

>

> God, though, it's boring being a grown-up, isn't

> it?



I'm with Flow and their customer service is very good too.


However I do always check out alternatives whenever my current contract comes to an end, and sometimes in between as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...