Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We found a way to sneak the washing machine and tumble dryer into some unusable kitchen space but accessible from 'outside' the kitchen (and isolated from the kitchen itself somewhat - so less noise). Which sounds very convoluted now I've written it down.


I suppose it's only really one-up from having the w/m and t/d in the kitchen in a cupboard - and definitely doesn't qualify as a 'utility room'.


Depends how much having them rumbling away in the kitchen proper would annoy you. For us, it would have been 'a lot' so anything is better than nothing.

Is the kitchen space large and square? Large and rectangular? My kitchen has a narrow rectangular utility on the back of it, its the width of the kitchen. There are two windows on the longest wall, back door into the garden on the shortest wall to the right. There is a separate WC on the shortest wall to the left, then is the sink and drainer with cupboards above.

wall .... window....wall ....window .....

double sink washer dryer freezer ...... floor cupboards

------

WC ........ floor space ........ back door

------

long kitchen wall: half glazed door, then brick wall with window panel in it allowing light from utility windows into kitchen.


KITCHEN ....


GOOD LUCK


Does that help?

I may re-jig this utility room: Remove sink and drainer so that american fridge freezer stands in current sink space on left ... put sink under window for garden view ....

We are about to do work and decided to close off the current corridor into the kitchen and enter only via the door that goes out of our current dining area. It means we will have only one entry into the kitchen, can put washing machine and tumble dryer in the now closed corridor and then our kitchen area will be on the near end of new extension meaning dining area can look directly into the garden. I know others don?t like this idea but our current dining area is poorly used so storage/ desk/ piano area and part corridor is a better use for us
We built a false wall at the back of the kitchen and housed the fridge freezer in the centre then doors either side to washer/dryer and a pantry cupboard on the other side. They are larger spaces than usual kitchen cupboards so you can actually stand inside but not a true utility room.

alex_b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We looked at it, but it didn?t make sense for us

> in terms of flow, use of space or cost. In the end

> we stacked our washer and drier in a purpose build

> cupboard in the kitchen which hides it all away

> without taking too much space.


Same here. I'd say utility rooms take up a lot of space best used other ways. We got rid of ours when we did a side return.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...