Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I?m wondering how others have resolved cases on eBay before. Situation is that I bought a fabric SkipHop baby playmate/gym described as ?hardly used? and when I opened it on arrival found that it stinks of cigarette smoke! The advert didn?t say it came from a smoker?s home - wouldn?t have bid on it if that had been the case.

Any advice?

You could try contacting the seller but I don't think you would be able to get a refund unless the advert specifically stated from a smoke free home. Sounds very frustrating and I am sure I would not have checked if it was from a smoke free home but then I don't think the seller has to state it.

What howl said.

eBay has changed recently & it no longer seems to be ?buyer beware?.


If you request to return the item, then you will get your money back (the seller cannot refuse a return unless they just refund you/offer you a partial refund). If there are any problems, start an issue through the resolution centre.

I?ve written to the seller, told them it stinks and asked what they propose. If they come back to me with an unsatisfactory response then I?ll go through the refund process through the Resolution Centre. I suspect he might tell me to wash it and it?ll be fine but hell no! Wasn?t cheap either.


Thanks all!

I think you may find it difficult to return the item if the description didn't state that it was from a smoke free home. The onus is on the buyer to ask questions if something like this is important, and particularly if I'm buying an expensive item, I always check with the seller if s/he is a smoker before bidding. You may find that the seller is reasonable and will accept a return, although if you told them in your email that the item 'stinks' that may just have put their back up a bit!

Howl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Disagree- no item comes with/is made smelling of

> smoke. It?s absolutely a ?not as described? issue

> and up to the seller to communicate. Just because

> some sellers oblige on the smoke free home

> point....


Could be argued that no item comes with/is made NOT smelling of smoke either...

I'm not saying it's right to accept such an item but don't feel you can argue that it's not as described as it didn't say either way.

As Growlybear says, lets hope the seller is reasonable and understands the gripe.

If the item had been described as coming from a smoke free home and arrived smelling of smoke, then it would be 'not as described', but if this isn't mentioned in the item description then how can it be 'not as described'? Many parents smoke, and if it's going to be an issue for a buyer who wants to make sure an item doesn't smell of smoke, then the onus is on them to check this before they bid and enter into a legally binding contract.
I had this with a decorative stone I bought as a present. It completely stank of smoke when I opened the envelope, before I?d unwrapped layers of bubble wrap. I didn?t think I?d get anywhere but contacted the buyer who was amazingly apologetic and I sent it back for a refund with no problem. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...