Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's some quality arguing, "How many Class 230's do you think is needed to operate the hourly Bedford to Bletchley service?" These are the questions to which we need answers!


Much as I admit I have too much time on my hands, there are many more five figure posters on here than just Sue!

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's some quality arguing, "How many Class 230's

> do you think is needed to operate the hourly

> Bedford to Bletchley service?" These are the

> questions to which we need answers!

>

> Much as I admit I have too much time on my hands,

> there are many more five figure posters on here

> than just Sue!



Yes I know I just compared the users that Malumbu Highlighted. Nothing sinister.


Foxy

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who's got the most time on their hands..

>

> User Posts

>

> Sue 18,365

> Foxy 8,779

> Louisa 5,537

> Rendel 3,013

>

>



I think to gain better insight into who is the most active, these figures need to be normalised for length of time since registered....so divide by number of months on the forum for an average monthly rate....


....or perhaps it doesn't matter a toss:)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who's got the most time on their hands..

>

> User Posts

>

> Sue 18,365

> Foxy 8,779

> Louisa 5,537

> Rendel 3,013




Figures like that are completely meaningless posted out of context.


Perhaps you could also post up the date these people joined the forum.


Also, some people retain the same user name, others change theirs, in some cases quite frequently. So you would have to add all their posts together, under their different names.



But nice try :))



ETA: An average number of posts per year would be a better comparison.


It would also be instructive to break the posts down into what forum sections they were posted in.


And as for better forums than the EDF for a good argument, there's been quite a recent ding-dong on a no-dig allotment group on Facebook, as to whether the use of glyphosate (a systemic weedkiller) to clear a plot of couch grass on a one-off basis prior to planting is compatible with the no-dig philosophy :))

Sue, I have had the same name on this forum from day one.


The basic figures suggest that you find more time in your day to respond to others on this forum. As well as open up threads yourself. The figures do not lie.


I personally have had a busy few weeks, and I?ve only managed to squeeze the odd post in here and there between other things.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I have had the same name on this forum from

> day one.

>

> The basic figures suggest that you find more time

> in your day to respond to others on this forum. As

> well as open up threads yourself. The figures do

> not lie.

>

> I personally have had a busy few weeks, and I?ve

> only managed to squeeze the odd post in here and

> there between other things.

>



I wasn't referring to anybody mentioned in the OP, Louisa.


I was making a general point.


What point are you making? Of course I have time in my day. I am retired.


I no longer work very long hours plus commuting across London.


I am actually usually very busy, including booking, promoting and running music gigs and growing flowers and vegetables, and in gaps in between being very busy I post on this forum and also on Facebook. I hope that's OK with you :))


Are you trying to start an argument now? :) :)) :))


ETA: And if "the figures do not lie", perhaps you could give a yearly (or monthly) breakdown of posts, as suggested by both myself and The Cat above.


Not that it matters anyway. So what if some people post on here more than others? It's a bloody forum, that's what it's here for :)) :)) :))


In fact I have just posted this as a bit of light relief from slogging through a tedious spreadsheet .......

Personally I'm more interested in the content of what people post than their number of posts.


Helpful posts giving useful information - good.


Items for sale or wanted - good.


Genuine recommendations for tradespeople - good on the whole, probably more good than bad


Opinions based on demonstrable facts - good.


Personal experiences when they are relevant to the thread topic - good mostly


Vindictive personal attacks - bad


Deliberate trolling to get a response - bad


Lying - bad


None of the other forums I post on have any of the last three categories, to the best of my knowledge, however heated the discussions become.


ETA: A considerable number of people who had been regular posters on here for years left because of ridiculous posts on here that it was impossible to respond to because of the totally illogical reasoning.


The wading through treacle posts 😀


Sometimes hard to tell whether the illogical reasoning is deliberate but quite subtle trolling, or whether the posters concerned really do think (I use the term loosely) like that 😀

I like some emotional non-logic posts - life isn't all about cold hard logic Mr Spock :)


"Whereas logic is the language of the conscious mind, emotion is the language of the unconscious mind. We know that emotions are reactions to perceived and imagined stimuli, not based on logic, but on one's own personal experiences. Emotions often outweigh our logic. ... Goleman calls this skill "emotional intelligence."


http://westsidetoastmasters.com/resources/laws_persuasion/chap14.html

I think this forum is quite tame, overall. If anything, the loss of former regulars, often unfairly blamed on myself and fox amongst others, has dampened down the confrontation. The forum has become quite boring IMO. It seems to me, the forum should have been careful what it wished for. Because here are the consequences, loss of regulars, dumbing down of interesting characters, and a forum which has lost its bite.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

the loss of former regulars, often

> unfairly blamed on myself and fox amongst others,

> has dampened down the confrontation.

>The forum has become quite boring IMO.

>It seems to me, the forum should have been careful

>what it wished for. Because here are the consequences,

>loss of regulars, dumbing down of interesting characters,

>and a forum which has lost its bite.




You think the forum should be about "confrontation", Louisa?


Just having a break from looking at potential new broadband providers, btw, because I have so much time on my hands :)) :)) :))


ETA: Oh, and those regulars said quite clearly why they were leaving, so I'm not quite sure why you use the words "unfairly blamed" :))

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think this forum is quite tame, overall. If

> anything, the loss of former regulars, often

> unfairly blamed on myself and fox amongst others,

> has dampened down the confrontation. The forum has

> become quite boring IMO. It seems to me, the forum

> should have been careful what it wished for.

> Because here are the consequences, loss of

> regulars, dumbing down of interesting characters,

> and a forum which has lost its bite.

>

> Louisa



Nothing?s ever as good as it used to be, eh?

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > I love this one on railway technology.

> > No holds barred in some of the comments.

>

> Can you point to some specific examples?



I just went to one of my old forums which resurrected again - the C word being used liberally on the mandatory "brexit" thread. Seems to be a rep system now - with no obvious way to give bad rep but someones on -31 - maybe you need so many posts before you can do the nasty.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> the loss of former regulars, often

> > unfairly blamed on myself and fox amongst

> others,

> > has dampened down the confrontation.

> >The forum has become quite boring IMO.

> >It seems to me, the forum should have been

> careful

> >what it wished for. Because here are the

> consequences,

> >loss of regulars, dumbing down of interesting

> characters,

> >and a forum which has lost its bite.

>

>

>

> You think the forum should be about

> "confrontation", Louisa?

>

> Just having a break from looking at potential new

> broadband providers, btw, because I have so much

> time on my hands :)) :)) :))

>

> ETA: Oh, and those regulars said quite clearly why

> they were leaving, so I'm not quite sure why you

> use the words "unfairly blamed" :))


It?s easy to pass the buck in these situations isn?t it Sue?


I do not recall any of the defunct regulars specifically raising my name on this forum as a reason for no longer posting. If they genuinely felt I was a valid reason for not contributing any longer, perhaps they should have contacted me directly and we could have resolved any issues.


At no stage did I suggest the forum should be about confrontation. But inevitably, people agreeing for the sake of agreeing is just ridiculous. We all have opinions, and we should be able to discuss things as adults without the pack mentality which often develops on here. It?s a cop out to suggest that because you are frustrated with someone?s opinion, you can?t reason with them and therefore you stop using the forum. Bizarre in fact.


And yes, just to remind you Sue, not that it matters, but you did respond to me TWICE earlier in this thread before I responded. Nothing wrong with that of course, but it does suggest you find more time to reply, which goes along with the fox and his original theory.


Louisa.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think this forum is quite tame, overall. If

> > anything, the loss of former regulars, often

> > unfairly blamed on myself and fox amongst

> others,

> > has dampened down the confrontation. The forum

> has

> > become quite boring IMO. It seems to me, the

> forum

> > should have been careful what it wished for.

> > Because here are the consequences, loss of

> > regulars, dumbing down of interesting

> characters,

> > and a forum which has lost its bite.

> >

> > Louisa

>

>

> Nothing?s ever as good as it used to be, eh?


Personally I enjoy the forum still, no issues for me. I do miss some of the old regulars, but I?m sure they?re still watching and possibly even contributing! So there?s no lamenting the past from me! I?m happy!


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...