Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think having a tattoo shop in the lordship lane or surrounding area might be good with the right artists and a welcoming atmospher , having a few tattoos myself and wishing to add the names of my children to new designs would make me visit, but as for prices that would be the selling point for some clients

just my op but hope this works as a business plan and should you get it right I will be knocking on the door

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The idea is a bit...how shall we say...Peckham


Well I come from Peckham.. Lived there 28 years and have lived in ED since 1980..


I do not have any Tattoos....


Just how many Forumite have them. ??


Seems to be more popular with the ladies these days ..

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> silverfox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The idea is a bit...how shall we say...Peckham

>

> Well I come from Peckham.. Lived there 28 years

> and have lived in ED since 1980..

>

> I do not have any Tattoos....

>

> Just how many Forumite have them. ??

>

> Seems to be more popular with the ladies these

> days ..


Since when did the forum represent the majority of East Dulwich? Since when did the forum get such a snobbish attitude? oops sorry silly qs!!!


ignore the negative attitudes pedro. At least you wont have to put up with "those" kind of customers ;-)

I'm of the understanding that people travel to tattoo parlours on the word of mouth recommendation for the tattoo artist. You can open a tattoo parlour where you like but if no one is interested in the artists you have then you'll just be doing trade in tiny butterflies on the shoulder or tramp stamps......Fair enough but maybe not sufficient to sustain a business.


PS - my son wants to be a tattoo artist maybe he can come and do work experience with you when you open.

Please no, I'm begging you. Seriously I have begun to loathe tattoos whereas previously I just didn't want one myself. If you were going to open up coudl I suggest you draw up a code of practice:


Nothing on the face or neck - except with written permission from grandchildren

No Tats for anyone under 25 - with stringent id conditions.

all to be hown aged pictures of themselves with tats aged 70


I just get so depressed seeing how young people have mutilated themselves for life

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > silverfox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The idea is a bit...how shall we

> say...Peckham

> >

> > Well I come from Peckham.. Lived there 28

> years

> > and have lived in ED since 1980..

> >

> > I do not have any Tattoos....

> >

> > Just how many Forumite have them. ??

> >

> > Seems to be more popular with the ladies these

> > days ..

>

> Since when did the forum represent the majority of

> East Dulwich? Since when did the forum get such a

> snobbish attitude? oops sorry silly qs!!!

>

> ignore the negative attitudes pedro. At least you

> wont have to put up with "those" kind of customers

> ;-)



Exactly KK....I've been wanting another tattoo for years. Lived here all my life- be great to have one on my doorstep. Good luck to you!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has it  been more  of an absolute shambles ever since the council took back management?
    • You miss the point entirely. The motivations of the the BBC's victims are irrelevant. You are advocating that their failure to be impartial is justified because you disagree politically with the people they are inaccurate about. This is the whole problem.  They don't make these "mistakes" with Starmer / the Greens / Davey because they agree with everything those people say. 
    • So... you saw them then? In spite of them having no lights (and presumably being dressed in all black / coming out of nowhere / insert any other standard anti-cyclist trope here). I've long thought that the best way of being visible as a cyclist is to wear all black, have no lights and to ride on the pavement (or jump red lights). Not only does literally *everyone* see you, they pop onto the local forum to complain about you! On the other hand if you dress in all yellow and get T-boned, the driver will still manage to say "sorry mate, I didn't see you". 😉
    • Fine dude - you do you. I dont think you have the slightest interest in the BBC (whereas clearly HeadNun dos) other than its elimination.  If it made these mistakes against starmer/davey/greens whoever I doubt you would get as upset. It’s all very “bring a pen to Brexit referendum because they can rub out pencil  votes” (“but strafe!! Dave hasn’t said any of these things on here  and if you suggest he does elsewhere you have no proof!”  This is true! And yet here we are ) I’ll ask again. Why do you think lowe said foreigner and domestic.  Instead of just “criminals”?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...