Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There?s another one stuck on the ?Give way/stop? sign at junction of Scutari and Colyton roads

Too high to reach and stuck to the sign with strong adhesive

Apart from the abhorrent nature of these posters, does this constitute a separate offence of defacing a road Sign?

ontheRye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There?s another one stuck on the ?Give way/stop?

> sign at junction of Scutari and Colyton roads

> Too high to reach and stuck to the sign with

> strong adhesive

> Apart from the abhorrent nature of these posters,

> does this constitute a separate offence of

> defacing a road Sign?


I'll add this one to the police report too!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hmmm, a pattern emerges over where they?ve been

> > placed then.

>

>

> What do you mean, JoeLeg?


Peckham Rye, Scutari Road, Brenchley Gardens, all to the west of Forest Hill Road so far. A small geographic area. Probably isn?t significant of anything more than they chose to slap a few up quickly and run off.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Peckham Rye, Scutari Road, Brenchley Gardens, all

> to the west of Forest Hill Road so far. A small

> geographic area. Probably isn?t significant of

> anything more than they chose to slap a few up

> quickly and run off.


All locations where there are easy escapes into open areas if challenged, possibly? If they weren't so utterly vile their cowardice would be rather amusing.

I hadn?t realised the Revolution was going to start in Peckham Rye Park. Were there a lot of ?Marxist maggots? round here to intimidate then? Or more likely, is this a bloke with about two brain cells to rub together, whose top achievement in life is getting some of his English middle class neighbours indignant? Someone needs to get out more eh? (and I don?t mean down the park)

Peckhamguy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha what the hell funny person

> I don?t need to cover up nothing, everyone knows

> me on here and they know what I?m about ,witch is

> nothing of the sort thank you 🥂

> Very silly


Yes I think we're all clear what you're about, you went to look at a neo-nazi site and came back saying there was nothing bad on it. If your initial comment was so sensible and justifiable, why have you deleted it?

Peckhamguy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Silly rendell cover my tracks with snowflakes yh

> lol

> Everyone knows me here and they know im nothing of

> the sort, cheers 🥂 tho Randell top man



You?ve made a total of 31 posts, so unless you used to post under a different name I?d say no, no one here knows you, except for the bit where you defend neo-nazi?s.


You don?t seem to like being argued with, which makes you quite the snowflake yourself.

Everyone knows me here - Going back over previous posts (in this name) of yours you appear to be an electrician, with a van, prepared to do ironing and with an interest in items to sell or buy - most of your posts are not however in this section, or the Lounge, so an ability to judge you for what you are and believe in the main rests on this thread - which people have been doing. You are certainly however not hiding; you have included a name, mobile number and post-code in your various posts. You have an absolute right to express an opinion (assuming that expression does not itself break the law, as appears to be the case for those responsible for the poster we are discussing) - but others have a similar right to comment on it.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ peckham_ryu

>

> Indeed. What is it about these "movements" that

> attract dim losers? They are clearly

> overcompensating for deficiences elsewhere with

> their tough guy routines.


Interestingly, when I joined the WRP years back (me and my mate fancied a couple of girls), they were telling us to persuade black people to join them and gave distinct instructions on the lines of chat. When I left the WRP I was threatened with physical violence...I left because they were a bunch of idiots and only interested in power for themselves- and of course it gave the air-heads of the theatrical world an opportunity for virtue signalling- I mean it is VERY easy to be a libtard when you are well off!

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ peckham_ryu

>

> Indeed. What is it about these "movements" that

> attract dim losers? They are clearly

> overcompensating for deficiences elsewhere with

> their tough guy routines.


Thought you were talking about Brexit for a moment...

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and of course it gave the air-heads of

> the theatrical world an opportunity for virtue

> signalling- I mean it is VERY easy to be a libtard

> when you are well off!


Am I being dim or is this a non-sequitur? I don't understand what you're getting at.

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > and of course it gave the air-heads of

> > the theatrical world an opportunity for virtue

> > signalling- I mean it is VERY easy to be a

> libtard

> > when you are well off!

>

> Am I being dim or is this a non-sequitur? I don't

> understand what you're getting at.


Old uncle never misses an opportunity to go large with his bizarre prejudices, however shoehorned it might be!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Interestingly, when I joined the WRP years back

> (me and my mate fancied a couple of girls), they

> were telling us to persuade black people to join

> them and gave distinct instructions on the lines

> of chat. When I left the WRP I was threatened with

> physical violence...I left because they were a

> bunch of idiots and only interested in power for

> themselves- and of course it gave the air-heads of

> the theatrical world an opportunity for virtue

> signalling- I mean it is VERY easy to be a libtard

> when you are well off!



You just can?t help yourself, can you? Sad...

Seriously u lot are funny cover my tracks with snowflakes lol seriously people know me on here and can?t believe by now no one has even mentioned that, it?s just a imogi let?s not all get upset

Trying make me out like something I?m not

And I deleted my comment because I could not be bothered with it all but now obviously made things worse 😂

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...