Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there!


A bit of advice needed please......


What age is best to let your child brush their teeth all by themselves??? I have a 4 year old, well 4 and a half (she always reminds me to remember the half!!) year old and she is really keen on brushing her teeth all by herself. We have reached a compromise where I brush her teeth in the morning and then she brushes them at bedtime. She reallllllllllly wants to do everything for herself and she does a good job but I just cant help myself!!!!!


So what do you think is a good age to start?????


Thanks :))

Fair enough. For what it's worth, my four year old boy is a rather reluctant tooth-brusher and needs a lot of supervision, otherwise he just chews his brush for a few seconds and declares Finished! So, I think we are a long way from his doing it all himself, but I'm keen to ensure he at least starts to understand the process.
We spend about 20 mins each morning and evening over the big tooth brushing debate - my daughter will do anything to avoid brushing hers!!! I think you should count yourself lucky and embrace her independence, but as Moos advises, have regular check ups with the dentist.

Thanks guys, will do.


Thinking about it, I think it was the flashing toothbrush from the pound-shop that sparked off my daughters interest in brushing her own teeth. It flashes for a minute at a time and she loved it as she got to tap it to re start the flashing and she knew when it was time to stop brushing them. Give it a try, even when you have to replace the toothbrush if you cant get hold of another flashing one keep it just as a guild line for them x

My 4 year old has probably only let us brush his teeth about twice since he started at age 18 months. Unless we pin him down and force his mouth open, (we haven't!) it's not going to happen....but I am assuming that the psychological damage of doing this would be worse than having a filling! We bought him an electric toothbrush, which kept his interest in doing it himself and also it seems to clean them even if he just sticks it in his mouth and swishes it around a bit. Personally I would let your daughter do it herself, especially if she's doing a good job of it. She's obviously feeling independent enough and that's important to her. Regular dental check ups should help stop your worries.
You can get little egg timer type thing from amazon - just check it's 2 mins because the one I just bought is nearer 3! Good for encouraging a decent length of brushing. Our daughter is 6.5 and she brushes in morning and we brush at night. Good balance of control for me and independence for her!

I have told my kids you have to be seven before you are allowed to do your own teeth morning and night. (They do their own in the morning, I do them at night.)

My husband thinks I am mad to have set an arbitrary cut-off point and I see his point, it depends on the child and their abilities. But it has stopped all arguments, which I think would otherwise be nightly. If the younger one says anything about doing it herself, the older one puts her straight for me! (They are 2 and 4 now.)


Don't know where I got the age seven from, but after I'd said it once I stuck to it!

I was told to help until they are 6 but still help my 7 year old now & again.


We bought disclosure tablets from the chemist (those red tablets that you chew that show up the plaque). I let my daughter brush then used the tablet so she could see where she was missing. Use 1 every now & again to check technique & hide them away the rest of the timer you get nagged non stop!!


My rule is I do the first bit, then they can take over - morning & night. That way you know their teeth are all being cleaned twice a day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...