Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nice to see you keeping a civil tongue.

Don't worry I'm thoroughly convinced that a change of name after a vicious massacre means that it's 'different', but anyway that's now three times in a pretty short span, I call troll.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice to see you keeping a civil tongue.

> Don't worry I'm thoroughly convinced that a change

> of name after a vicious massacre means that it's

> 'different', but anyway that's now three times in

> a pretty short span, I call troll.


Whatever.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice to see you keeping a civil tongue.

> Don't worry I'm thoroughly convinced that a change

> of name after a vicious massacre means that it's

> 'different', but anyway that's now three times in

> a pretty short span, I call troll.


Why should I keep a civil tongue after you've accused me of lying about my employment? Now that's offensive. Not racist, just downright spiteful. I mean, say you've got kids, and I call bullshit to score points. Would you remain polite? I think not, somehow.

Well if you really do, on your conscience be it I guess.

We've all got families to feed, but those of us who are good at we do can pick and choose our jobs.

I wouldn't do it, I genuinely consider Xe immoral, but each to their own.


My wife was working for BAe systems when we met, she was uncomfortable about it, and once she talked about her reservations, well, she left there within days and since her career has soared.

Maybe a change would be for the good in every sense of the word.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well if you really do, on your conscience be it I

> guess.

> We've all got families to feed, but those of us

> who are good at we do can pick and choose our

> jobs.

> I wouldn't do it, I genuinely consider Xe immoral,

> but each to their own.

>

> My wife was working for BAe systems when we met,

> she was uncomfortable about it, and once she

> talked about her reservations, well, she left

> there within days and since her career has

> soared.

> Maybe a change would be for the good in every

> sense of the word.


Look, pal. I sleep just fine at night. But please, don't let that get in the way of your attempt to patronise me. I work hard for what I earn, and I've got shares in the company. I also fought for this country in Kuwait. So don't bother lecturing me.


Oh, and your wife sounds like a f@ckin' hippie.

Rick Channing - troll:

"I see, so now you've resorted to the hallmark of the defeated: name calling. It's pitiful, but at least it shows that you're unable to reasonably refute any argument for [insert argument here]."


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,724536,724639#msg-724639

Shares in Xe, it is owned by a private investment company...made up of Manhattan Securities and Forte Capital Advisors, isn't it?


Having worked, I hesitate to say alongside, Blackwater employees in both Iraq and Afghanistan up to 2006, we ought to be able to swap some good stories.


Mostly, in Iraq they swaggered with their Gucci'd up equipment and outdrank all the other loafers in the Emerald City.



By the way I also went into Kuwait day one and Iraq day one too.

Rick Channing - your three days' worth of posts certainly looks like trolling to me.


What I can't understand is why you choose to locate yourself and your family among a bunch of "f@ckin' hippies". If DJKQ and I (http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,722334,724666,page=3#msg-724666) can manage to find common cause with the Daily Telegraph, how come you can't find even one point of agreement with your neighbors?

lol at the indtroduction of hugornots quest for debate of cioncept of quality lol its arl a bit zen an the art of mocycle maninence again init wear a flowr in yuor head rick when yuo go to fan sanfrico with the hipies lol blody mericans comning ovr here an taking upur internet over rofl

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...